I've explained the anybody but sisu thing before. I want sisu to get shit and get pressure but I don't think they are the only ones who should. I started a thread on here for example that took me an hour or so writing all the things sisu should do (aside from selling as it was clear they shouldn't.)
It got a few likes, a few well saids and that was that. Everybody (bar one mentalist it seems) knows that sisu are pricks.
The issue is clouded because when somebody says something about somebody else you have people who then go on about being a sisu sympathiser and all that nonsense. It then turns into a 75 pager because people are saying that others have done nothing wrong. If somebody posts sisu are cunts then people just shrug and agree.
Yeah I do over think things sometimes and get things wrong, I do get a lot right though
I'm really not a significant figure, I just run a website. I like the fact I don't know any of them personally, if for example it was my actual friend or colleague involved then of course I'd be biased. I may tell them in private and discuss it but I wouldn't feel as comfortable calling them a c**t like I can with fisher or Lucas etc.
When I say people at the council I don't been a cleaner or bin man or anything like that. I'm talking people who are likely to be more involved.
When somebody is on the board of our fans group, is heavily involved with the council (not the leader or ex leader by any means but somebody who is as passionate about their politics as their football). They then purposely create accounts to try and mislead people with things they had made up, I'd say that's an agenda. Wouldn't you?
Its different to Dave the bin man who goes to the football on a Saturday and thinks sisu are bell ends and should go.
Its very naive to think there aren't loads of agendas at play. There's so much pr drilled into people.