Otis
Well-Known Member
Was more concerned with the younger bloke. The older guy got 2 years in prison, but the younger bloke got a suspended sentence, despite the fact he was complicit in a father raping his own son, through his encouragment for the father to carry out the act.That was hard to watch but interesting to hear the comments of the police on what a drain the vigilantes are on their resources and how their actions can lead to cases being thrown out of court.
The sentences those two got seemed way too low to me. The older guy seemed like he might not be all there but obviously with the seriousness of the crimes they focused on the younger guy. With what they were describing I can't see any way the sentence is even close to correct.
For me he should have got the much more severe sentence.
Seems like the older bloke was grooming, but that no sexual offence had actually taken place.
Should have been 4 or 5 years for the old guy and 10 years for the younger bloke.