48 hours away from expulsion / New Ricoh Talks! (8 Viewers)

[rob9872]

You might want to check with whoever was using your account that said you haven't been to many games (about half) this season the bet was about how many games you had been to.

I wonder how many will do the full 46 this season - league games only not including eg Cheltenham in the Checkatrade - fair play to you nutters who did go! There can't be many as I'd guess no more than a couple of hundred at Fleetwood being the lowest we've seen and we've still missed some games and I know others there who aren't always.

We've missed 6, although had a ticket of 3 of them at home, missing through sickness and holiday and missed 3 away (but did see Luton on the telly).

My daughter has 2 days sick from school this year, would have been 100% but was missing for midweek City away games lol.

 

---

[rob9872]

These new accounts are all very weird

Totally agree, I've only ever had one account on here and had the same username on LAST before this, one twitter account and I don't do facebook. Have an account but not used for ten years. People are strange.

 

[clint van damme]

When are we expecting white smoke from the hallowed stadium? The wait is killing me.

 

[Limey]

Just having a quick skim through. Where have these 49% share rumours come from??

 

[clint van damme]

Just having a quick skim through. Where have these 49% share rumours come from??

this forum!

 

[chiefdave]

Yes they’re making a loss, but CVC will be taking their turnover rather than waiting for any residual profit. That spells bad news for business unless their income takes quite a big leap.

Anyone who reads up on how CVC acted with F1 will know this is not good news for rugby.

 

[Captain Dart]

What is made up exactly?

You said they are "my mates" when I've never met them and I do not post on twitter sycophanticly agreeing with them. You made that up.
You say I'm a Cov Utd supporter when I haven't even been to see them this season (or the Sphinx which I've sometimes seen). How would you know anyway?
Why do you attack local non league football, is that the right attitude for the owner of this site? I don't think so.
You used (and Grendel still does) imply I have contacts or alegience to the Council, I don't have anything to do with them and never have.

Also I notice you keep talking about various newer accounts on the fourm in a negative way if they disagree with your POV.
If a new account appears that agrees with your line you do not question it.

The whole way you behave towards users gets critisised from time to time, but you are not receptive to that feedback and just go on as you are.

I had a look over the posts you made in this topic, 55 out of 391 (14%) of them 24 are pretty much attacks on persons or organisations you don't like and 7 are condesending or sarcastic, otherwise you are not so bad (that was sarcasm).

 

[SkyBlueDom26]

You said they are "my mates" when I've never met them and I do not post on twitter sycophanticly agreeing with them. You made that up.
You say I'm a Cov Utd supporter when I haven't even been to see them this season (or the Sphinx which I've sometimes seen). How would you know anyway?
Why do you attack local non league football, is that the right attitude for the owner of this site? I don't think so.
You used (and Grendel still does) imply I have contacts or alegience to the Council, I don't have anything to do with them and never have.

Also I notice you keep talking about various newer accounts on the fourm in a negative way if they disagree with your POV.
If a new account appears that agrees with your line you do not question it.

The whole way you behave towards users gets critisised from time to time, but you are not receptive to that feedback and just go on as you are.

I had a look over the posts you made in this topic, 55 out of 391 (14%) of them 24 are pretty much attacks on persons or organisations you don't like and 7 are condesending or sarcastic, otherwise you are not so bad (that was sarcasm).

Sending shots Dart

I thought this thread was about the ricoh

 

[ajsccfc]

I went to see the Sphinx a handful of times during the Sixfields season, one game saw a last-minute comeback win and a punchup. Proper football, that.

 

[Captain Dart]

Sending shots Dart

I thought this thread was about the ricoh

I'll stop now, I figure I've made my point.

 

[SkyBlueDom26]

I went to see the Sphinx a handful of times during the Sixfields season, one game saw a last-minute comeback win and a punchup. Proper football, that.

Did you start the punchup

 

[Liquid Gold]

Cov United were set up to try and nick fans from ccfc during Northampton. Hope they go bust.

 

[Nick]

You said they are "my mates" when I've never met them and I do not post on twitter sycophanticly agreeing with them. You made that up.
You say I'm a Cov Utd supporter when I haven't even been to see them this season (or the Sphinx which I've sometimes seen). How would you know anyway?
Why do you attack local non league football, is that the right attitude for the owner of this site? I don't think so.
You used (and Grendel still does) imply I have contacts or alegience to the Council, I don't have anything to do with them and never have.

Also I notice you keep talking about various newer accounts on the fourm in a negative way if they disagree with your POV.
If a new account appears that agrees with your line you do not question it.

The whole way you behave towards users gets critisised from time to time, but you are not receptive to that feedback and just go on as you are.

I had a look over the posts you made in this topic, 55 out of 391 (14%) of them 24 are pretty much attacks on persons or organisations you don't like and 7 are condesending or sarcastic, otherwise you are not so bad (that was sarcasm).

I always check new users yes, I also get alerts to multiple logons or if they look dodgy.

Was it not you trying to get a thread about cov United going with their news etc with more interest then you seemed to have ever shown about ccfc?

This site isn't about non League football, the only time I'd give a shit is if somebody I knew played for any of the non League Saturday teams. I'm not going to pretend to be interested when I'm not.

The whole way I behave towards users who needed multiple personalities to push something and still had no interest in ccfc is probably visible.

Maybe you could draw up some stats across your two accounts about how many discuss ccfc for the football team or matches?

 

[BobbyDazzler]

I'll stop now, I figure I've made my point.

You made it very well too. I agree with everything you say about Nick’s approach with users on here. It is what keeps me from posting if I am honest.

 

[Nick]

You made it very well too. I agree with everything you say about Nick’s approach with users on here. It is what keeps me from posting if I am honest.

Of course it is!

 

[Cavan O'Doherty]

You made it very well too. I agree with everything you say about Nick’s approach with users on here. It is what keeps me from posting if I am honest.

Whether you agree with Nicks approach or not, to let one user stop you from posting is a bit feeble.

 

[olderskyblue]

Whether you agree with Nicks approach or not, to let one user stop you from posting is a bit feeble.

Maybe. GMK became quite toxic in the end, that's what finished it.

nick got a lot of people on this site from it, so we do need to be careful it doesn't head the same way. So many posts being derogatory to other posters does not help. and that's just nick.!!

 

[BobbyDazzler]

Of course it is!

As if to prove my point exactly. Your snide, sarcastic tone does you no favours at all.

I’m all for a good debate and have, for years watched threads develop on here (and GMK before it), contributing periodically if I felt moved to. However, I’ve increasingly been put off by your comments and they way you belittle people on here. It’s a shame because you’re probably a decent fella.

 

[BobbyDazzler]

Whether you agree with Nicks approach or not, to let one user stop you from posting is a bit feeble.

Not feeble. Just don’t want to contribute to a site where the person ‘in charge’ sets such a tone.

 

[covmark]

Not feeble. Just don’t want to contribute to a site where the person ‘in charge’ sets such a tone.

Boo hoo. The nasty man on the internet is being horrible to me.
Grow some bollocks you lame arse.
Cavan is correct. It's pretty feeble.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

[BobbyDazzler]

Boo hoo. The nasty man on the internet is being horrible to me.
Grow some bollocks you lame arse.
Cavan is correct. It's pretty feeble.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Thanks for your input!

 

[Liquid Gold]

I only go on to internet forums to agree with people all the time. If you don't like someone's opinion there is a block feature although using that is pretty feeble too.

 

[Nick]

As if to prove my point exactly. Your snide, sarcastic tone does you no favours at all.

I’m all for a good debate and have, for years watched threads develop on here (and GMK before it), contributing periodically if I felt moved to. However, I’ve increasingly been put off by your comments and they way you belittle people on here. It’s a shame because you’re probably a decent fella.

You hadn't logged into this account for about 2 years apart from now to try and stick to boot in with Dart. Excuse me for not blowing smoke up your arse.

I see straight through nonsense like this, it's the same as when you have those strange accounts appear just before the news about Wasps wanting to takeover the Higgs banging on about freedom of speech and dictatorship when they get pointed out.

 

[chiefdave]

Whether you agree with Nicks approach or not, to let one user stop you from posting is a bit feeble.

He could always just put Nick on ignore if he didn't like his posts? Would have thought that made more sense.

 

[eastwoodsdustman]

Sadly the forum has been undermined by the council or their reps in the past trying to push their agenda. Whenever there is something afoot a lot of new posters pop up and disappear soon afterwards hence Nicks vitriol towards some new posters. I'm sure there are one or two who sign up at the time and aren't linked to the council/webber shandwick or whoever but the timings are just unlucky.
As for GMK, posters on it were far more open minded, and I think people coming here after it went by the wayside have stopped this site being the anti sisu (at all costs) asylum that it once was. I know its dragged on a long time but a lot on GMK were already seeing the councils part in this whole mess years ago.

 

[BobbyDazzler]

You hadn't logged into this account for about 2 years apart from now to try and stick to boot in with Dart. Excuse me for not blowing smoke up your arse.

I see straight through nonsense like this, it's the same as when you have those strange accounts appear just before the news about Wasps wanting to takeover the Higgs banging on about freedom of speech and dictatorship when they get pointed out.

Nonsense like what?

Do you have to log in to read posts?

 

[BobbyDazzler]

Sadly the forum has been undermined by the council or their reps in the past trying to push their agenda. Whenever there is something afoot a lot of new posters pop up and disappear soon afterwards hence Nicks vitriol towards some new posters. I'm sure there are one or two who sign up at the time and aren't linked to the council/webber shandwick or whoever but the timings are just unlucky.
As for GMK, posters on it were far more open minded, and I think people coming here after it went by the wayside have stopped this site being the anti sisu (at all costs) asylum that it once was. I know its dragged on a long time but a lot on GMK were already seeing the councils part in this whole mess years ago.

I can assure you I am in no way connected to CCC or Wasps. I did, however use to post on GMK which in its heyday, was a fantastic forum. I’ve no idea where everybody went of if they regenerated on here. Who knows?

 

[vow]

GMK became quite toxic in the end, that's what finished it.

Haha, good try but incorrect, it was down to webserver issues and a webmaster admin who just didn't have the time anymore.

As for being "toxic", GMK wasn't for snowflakes, that's for sure.

 

[Nick]

Nonsense like what?

Do you have to log in to read posts?

Nope you don't need to login (I didn't say you did) but with everything going on in the last 2 or so years you only thought to login now? OK then.

What will happen is that you will come onto this thread, try to have your dig and then vanish again for months. Probably add in a couple of other accounts that have been sat about for years inactive.

They will try and have digs and then when things on here point out how people like the council or Wasps have also been up to no good they pop up to try and discredit so that people don't people what is being pointed out.

Rinse and repeat.

 

[Nick]

He could always just put Nick on ignore if he didn't like his posts? Would have thought that made more sense.

No because that doesn't make me look like a nasty bad man.

 

[Liquid Gold]

"Sir, they're not falling for the 'just blame sisu line'. What should I do"
"Call them nasty"
"On it"

 

[BobbyDazzler]

Nope you don't need to login (I didn't say you did) but with everything going on in the last 2 or so years you only thought to login now? OK then.

What will happen is that you will come onto this thread, try to have your dig and then vanish again for months. Probably add in a couple of other accounts that have been sat about for years inactive.

They will try and have digs and then when things on here point out how people like the council or Wasps have also been up to no good they pop up to try and discredit so that people don't people what is being pointed out.

Rinse and repeat.

Christ! What have I missed? They are the words of a paranoid man.

I have one account. I have a busy life. I read and post when I have time and the inclination. That’s it.

 

[chiefdave]

Nope you don't need to login (I didn't say you did) but with everything going on in the last 2 or so years you only thought to login now? OK then.

Maybe you should change the settings so you do need to login to read it. Will stop all the 'I've been reading for years but never bothered to login' members.

 

[Liquid Gold]

Christ! What have I missed? They are the words of a paranoid man.

I have one account. I have a busy life. I read and post when I have time and the inclination. That’s it.

Not had any free time in two years? Go and have a lie down.

 

[Nick]

Christ! What have I missed? They are the words of a paranoid man.

I have one account. I have a busy life. I read and post when I have time and the inclination. That’s it.

Ah, the "paranoid" line now. Predictable It's fact.

It's amazing that after a playoff / checkatrade win you don't feel inclined to discuss CCFC but if there's a dig at me you can't login quick enough.

OK then. It was almost as if there was other people pointing out strange accounts previously in the thread because it's that obvious.