Adam Le Fondre! Sisu are you watching! (3 Viewers)

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Another 2 goals in a crucial match for Reading.
That's the second week running!!
Sisu out.
 

You can see why he choose Reading over us. I like Reading there a proper community club.

I don't think SISU even stumped up the cash to begin with did they?

ALF must devastated. How do we try and persuade players to join us these days when even board members don't hang around beyond a month. :facepalm:
 

parvsl

New Member
F%£kin wankers! Im so annoyed. Money talks and reading didnt make a move till late august. We cud have bagged him June July if sisu werent fuckwits! Cov fans hav been mugged off for years. Never real investment, always sold our best and had to make do. Had enuff!! Sisu out! Or i wont be renewing my season ticket! Tossers.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
F%£kin wankers! Im so annoyed. Money talks and reading didnt make a move till late august. We cud have bagged him June July if sisu werent feckwits! Cov fans hav been mugged off for years. Never real investment, always sold our best and had to make do. Had enuff!! Sisu out! Or i wont be renewing my season ticket! Tossers.

Never real investment? You can't be that old then. It was investing money we didn't have that got us where we are now.
 
What's the difference if we signed him or not its the players around him which make a difference?u cud be best striker in the world but not have the best service

True but I think a fully fit goalscorer would have made enough difference to keep us up.

If we still had MK there's no doubt in my mind we'd have had more goals and therefore more points on the board. Our biggest problem this season has been not scoring enough goals.
 

Benkilby1

New Member
I h8 sisu just as much as u but if u think about it what would of happened if they wouldnt have bought the club.I agree, now it's time to jog on sisu
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I h8 sisu just as much as u but if u think about it what would of happened if they wouldnt have bought the club.I agree, now it's time to jog on sisu

We would have gone into admin and had new owners by now. Odds are we would at least be back in the championship by now
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
We would have gone into admin and had new owners by now. Odds are we would at least be back in the championship by now

I can't be bothered to look now, but wouldn't we have taken the 10 point hit and been 4 points above the drop zone? With bigger crowds, less ill-feeling toward the club and players like Leon Best on the books. Hmmm..... how very fortunate we are....
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
We'd have been equally disappointed. Granted it may have been a different tone of diappointment as we fell short of the play offs or endured mid table mediocrity. Its what we do and unless you're winning the league or at least challenging then we will never really be happy.
 

Colonel Mustard

New Member
I can't be bothered to look now, but wouldn't we have taken the 10 point hit and been 4 points above the drop zone? With bigger crowds, less ill-feeling toward the club and players like Leon Best on the books. Hmmm..... how very fortunate we are....

CCFC were already in their second straight year of declining attendances when SISU took over (this may or may not be of interest).

The likes of Leon Best would surely have been sold if the club were in administration - a firesale of all assets and cut-price hand-offs of the high salary players. Administration, with so much of the season to go at that point, would surely have made relegation even more likely than Pompey's.

And finally, we have no clue if anybody would actually have taken on the scraps of the club. McGinnity, Robinson and co were publicly pushing hard for new buyers, but the only interested parties seemed to be a couple of hedge funds and a publicity-seeker.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I can't be bothered to look now, but wouldn't we have taken the 10 point hit and been 4 points above the drop zone? With bigger crowds, less ill-feeling toward the club and players like Leon Best on the books. Hmmm..... how very fortunate we are....

I assume you are being ironic quoting Best? The prior regimes' inability to pay an instalment on his transfer fee led to a transfer embargo if I recall correctly which was only lifted when SISU took over.
SISU offered brief life support, the same outcome was always inevitable.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
CCFC were already in their second straight year of declining attendances when SISU took over (this may or may not be of interest).
.

There will be a response to this that 23,000 turned up to see Coventry play Colchester. This puzzled me at the time as it was the 8th biggest attendance at the Ricoh. Actually it is a red herring as admission was £5 and season ticket holders were given free tickets. More telling was the fact that 14,000 was also witnessed as an attendance that season.

The notion we would have been better off then is embarrasing.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Had we gone into administration, our creditors would've been shafted-and since the Council would have been one of the club's creditors, it would have missed out on money to use for public services. Result? The taxpayers, i.e. the people of Coventry, would have suffered as a consequence. Look at Portsmouth refusing to pay schools (as one example) and ask yourself if you'd prefer us to have 'enjoyed' the same kind of publicity that brings.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Okay, the season before the takeover, the average gate across all teams in the division over the season was 18,381; and our average 20,381

In 2007/8 - the season of the takeover, the divisional average 17,162, and ours 19,124

Now, this season to date, the divisional average sits at 17,673, and our average at 15,173

Over that term, gates across the division have dropped by 3.7%, whereas our gates have dropped in excess of 25%.

Comparing the seasons 2006/7 and 2007/8 the averages across the league dropped by 6.6%, and our gates by 6.2%; so to address Colonel's point; yes gates we're in decline as cited, but our decline almost exactly mirrored that of the balance of the league in that 'window'. However, over the term, I'm sure you'll agree there's an alarming dichotomy between our performance and that of the averaged balance of the division
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Okay, the season before the takeover, the average gate across all teams in the division over the season was 18,381; and our average 20,381

In 2007/8 - the season of the takeover, the divisional average 17,162, and ours 19,124

Now, this season to date, the divisional average sits at 17,673, and our average at 15,173

Over that term, gates across the division have dropped by 3.7%, whereas our gates have dropped in excess of 25%.

Comparing the seasons 2006/7 and 2007/8 the averages across the league dropped by 6.6%, and our gates by 6.2%; so to address Colonel's point; yes gates we're in decline as cited, but our decline almost exactly mirrored that of the balance of the league in that 'window'. However, over the term, I'm sure you'll agree there's an alarming dichotomy between our performance and that of the averaged balance of the division

Let's ignore the fact we moved into a new stadium. What do you think the crowds would have been had we stayed at Highfield Road? Truth is the average was 14,000 before and that is what it is now.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
But thats because the stayaways are fickle and we're back to the hard core. If we had offered them entertainment and better still a winning team they would have stayed (it was our best chance of keeping them regularly) and we would have collectively reaped the benefits. The fans are there as we see on the odd big game like Chelsea in the cup or Leeds last season, but we need to give them a reason to attend. Often its a choice and especially in troubled times. Most households have a budget and we need to give them an incentive to spend that budget on CCFC as opposed to the rest of us who go through the motions out of a sense of duty.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Lots of teams in the division over the term have moved to new stadia. Stoke, Sunderland, Blackpool, Swansea, Derby, Leicester, Reading, Middlesbrough, Southampton, Hull, etc and have seen an increase in crowds and sustained it. The facts I've now presented you with show you that almost uniquely, we haven't during SISU's watch
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Lots of teams in the division over the term have moved to new stadia. Stoke, Sunderland, Blackpool, Swansea, Derby, Leicester, Reading, Middlesbrough, Southampton, Hull, etc and have seen an increase in crowds and sustained it. The facts I've now presented you with show you that almost uniquely, we haven't during SISU's watch

Out of interest what is Blackpool's new ground called?
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
I thought this was about Le Fondre? As it is then if Cody McDonald was in that team he too would score goals and be top of the table. Realistic please.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Let's ignore the fact we moved into a new stadium. What do you think the crowds would have been had we stayed at Highfield Road? Truth is the average was 14,000 before and that is what it is now.

I'll bid you good evening now, dear chap, but before I do, can I kindly dispel your insinuation that a team only enjoys a temporary blip in swollen gates before reverting back to that which frequented the old ground?

Can I kindly refer my learned friend toward Derby County? Moved from the Baseball Ground, which had a capacity of 18,300 in 1997. In their last season, they were in the Premier League and averaged a season-long gate of 17,889, They've since moved to Pride Park of course, and when back in the Championship were averaging - by the 2002/3 season a gate of 25,469.

Do you know what is sits at now? This season it's 26,021.

They've had a brief swansong in the top flight, and I know their legacy of footballing success means that their crowds - as a ratio of city size - are superior to ours; but they've proven that, even with the mundane being served up (they finished below us last season, for example) that crowds can be retained
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
I thought this was about Le Fondre? As it is then if Cody McDonald was in that team he too would score goals and be top of the table. Realistic please.

The Le Fondre transfer - from a CCFC perspective - wasn't an episode from which we emerged with much reflected glory. Le Fondre's words were one thing, but the Rotherham chairman's withering comments with regards our approach another.

The modus operandi he described sounded alarmingly like that Markon King and his agent made reference to....
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I'll bid you good evening now, dear chap, but before I do, can I kindly dispel your insinuation that a team only enjoys a temporary blip in swollen gates before reverting back to that which frequented the old ground?

Can I kindly refer my learned friend toward Derby County? Moved from the Baseball Ground, which had a capacity of 18,300 in 1997. In their last season, they were in the Premier League and averaged a season-long gate of 17,889, They've since moved to Pride Park of course, and when back in the Championship were averaging - by the 2002/3 season a gate of 25,469.

Do you know what is sits at now? This season it's 26,021.

They've had a brief swansong in the top flight, and I know their legacy of footballing success means that their crowds - as a ratio of city size - are superior to ours; but they've proven that, even with the mundane being served up (they finished below us last season, for example) that crowds can be retained

Not the best example imo. I agree with a lot of the other things you've said on this, but Derby showed that before the move they were operating at full capacity and probably therefore often had more wanting to attend games. At HR we were only operating at approx 60% full on average.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Not the best example imo. I agree with a lot of the other things you've said on this, but Derby showed that before the move they were operating at full capacity and probably therefore often had more wanting to attend games. At HR we were only operating at approx 60% full on average.

Okay, okay... ;-)

How about Hull? Came into the Championship in 2005/6 averaging 19,841 - with some momentum behind them with promotion, etc - and finished last season with 21,168. Capacity at the KC being 25,586 - so latent support not being a factor here. Any better?
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
As hard as it is to believe maybe he thought he was in with a better shout of success at reading!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top