Excusses Excesses.Not what I asked though is it?
It can if they get voted on.If there are two empty spaces why can one not be for a member from this forum?
Excusses Excesses.
Excusses Excesses.
Your fuckin worse then our MPs
"My way or no way"
Am I reading that right because it sounds like you have to attend the meeting to vote which is ridiculous in this day and age.Any Trust member on here or not on here is more than welcome to put themselves forward. If you can’t make the meeting and want to vote you can appoint a proxy to do so on your behalf.
I would definitely put Grendel forward. Bastard that he is he’s definitely a city fan and it would be better having on at others than us all the time.
Am I reading that right because it sounds like you have to attend the meeting to vote which is ridiculous in this day and age.
Am I reading that right because it sounds like you have to attend the meeting to vote which is ridiculous in this day and age.
A Twitter vote would be more reliableSorry. I’ve just spoken to Roger and he said if an election is required the procedure will be sent out detailing it. However he thinks you should be able to vote by email.
A Twitter vote would be more reliable
What if I signed up to the trust 5 years ago and no longer have access to that email? Voting by email is a really long winded way and is prone to all sorts of issues.No it wouldn’t be. There’s no way of checking if they’re a Trust member or not.
How you'd bond with Roger Ellis...?I do also have one other concern
You are a twat I knew it wouldn't last long.Ah yes Roger
Thought we were going anyway to encourage the Trust to get behind future protests more effectively?Am I reading that right because it sounds like you have to attend the meeting to vote which is ridiculous in this day and age.
You are a twat I knew it wouldn't last long.
What if I signed up to the trust 5 years ago and no longer have access to that email? Voting by email is a really long winded way and is prone to all sorts of issues.
It's antiquated to be fair, you could give every trust member a login and then one vote per login.
How many members of the trust is there, might need to hold the meeting somewhere bigger than the back room of a pub if everyone is expected to turn up and vote.Thought we were going anyway to encourage the Trust to get behind future protests more effectively?
Sorry Northern but your talking about Grendel. The person who character assassinates people without a thought. You want him to stand on a platform of inclusivity you're having a laugh.How you'd bond with Roger Ellis...?
Anyway, stand on a platform on giving a voice to this forum. Stand on a platform of inclusivity and widening the message. I'd vote for you on that
Because everybody with half a brain knows where this is leading. You've done it beforeWhy? Pretty innocuous statement
Sorry Northern but your talking about Grendel. The person who character assassinates people without a thought. You want him to stand on a platform of inclusivity you're having a laugh.
See - I think away from a forum there's space for him. I tend to treat forums as a bunch of nobodies just typing shite, although I agree some of the abuse directed at trust board members often seems... excessive, and also unfair on occasion in my view, as then they're actual people rather than a stupid pseudonym.Sorry Northern but your talking about Grendel. The person who character assassinates people without a thought. You want him to stand on a platform of inclusivity you're having a laugh.