We understand Wasps were also seeking in the collapsed confidential talks other indemnities and protections against other potential losses for the rugby club – and related parties.
The club and its owners Sisu believe Ricoh owners Wasps rugby club’s final conditions as an ultimatum for extending tenancy arrangements are “undeliverable” – and could bankrupt the club.
This is the key line:
Reading the article it seems Wasps were insisting the club indemnify them if they and / or the council were found to be in the wrong. No way the club would agree to that and its quite right that they shouldn't.The club and its owners Sisu believe Ricoh owners Wasps rugby club’s final conditions as an ultimatum for extending tenancy arrangements are “undeliverable” – and could bankrupt the club.
Be interesting to hear more about this, not just indemnity? What other protections are they seeking and why would the club be expected to cover other related parties as well as Wasps, who are they including in that?We understand Wasps were also seeking in the collapsed confidential talks other indemnities and protections against other potential losses for the rugby club – and related parties.
Be interesting to hear more about this, not just indemnity? What other protections are they seeking and why would the club be expected to cover other related parties as well as Wasps, who are they including in that?
ACL?Who is a related party in it all?
Some great Real Ale (variety) boozers from New St. towards the ground.Any good pubs near St Andrews?
Who is a related party in it all?
Yow cun get a buzz.Don't know Brum at all really - how easy is it to get to St Andrews from New St?
PUSB
Big surprise that the Wasps Telegraph makes no mention of their demands.As expected the telegraph haven’t produced the sticking points... just the £100k rent + maintenance costs
Well milk, guess your a happy bunny today, it works for you with your love for the owners
Don't know Brum at all really - how easy is it to get to St Andrews from New St?
PUSB