ccfcway
Well-Known Member
It’s not that black and white, The question your asking has raised its head less than a month ago, what about asking where the ground is that the owners produced the plans to and said was vital 6 years ago ?
A different point (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter TTG
- Start date
It’s not that black and white, The question your asking has raised its head less than a month ago, what about asking where the ground is that the owners produced the plans to and said was vital 6 years ago ?
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Yes massive question - one that our owners still have to answer... but until that’s built, where do we play?
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
Until or IF ?
Until, then I have not doubt most would put up with temporary relocation to have a home we call our home
IF, wel, isnt worth thinking about
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Both at the moment, I suppose it would be nice if the council could do what they did with Wasps and assist in finding a location for us to buy into
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
Spot on. It’s “when” or “if” that’s shocking
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
We do have ground staff and they have their own twitter account at CCFCGrounds
Seem to put a lot more work in than whoever has been responsible for the Ricoh pitches.
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
They coming to St. Andrews ?
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t have thought so unless you’re suggesting Birmingham’s ground staff aren’t up to the job?
Imagine the role of our ground staff will be the same as it has been for years.
Gazolba
Well-Known Member
Why would the EU investigate? We are leaving the EU.
Last edited:
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
Of course I’m not. I know this site has some experts in all things, but I’d be shocked if there are any insiders in the ability of the Birmingham F.C. groundman
Otis
Well-Known Member
A location for an imaginary stadium that Sisu have no intention of building?
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
I am honestly not close enough to this one as I dismissed it so wasnt following it. Nick was suggesting we submitted adequate planning permission for woodlands site and council dismissed it ?
MalcSB
Well-Known Member
Because the transaction occurred under EU law. Leaving has nothing to do with it.
TTG
Well-Known Member
They still have ryton tho
Nick
Administrator
Where was that said? It's baffling how people suddenly don't follow particular things.
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
if people is me, I said on the other thread I honestly didn't think it was the Woodlands site you were referring to as (maybe wrongly) I dismissed that as a complete non starter due to so many issues (transport, space, listed building etc).
I'm no planning officer or architect, so happy to be wrong and we should get behind sisu and push this site. This should be their approach, get the fans onside with their new stadium development plans
Last edited:
joemercersaces
Well-Known Member
Didn’t set foot in Sixfields as I believed then that SISU were holding the club hostage to get the Ricoh. This time it doesn’t seem anything like as black and white. In fact I now lean towards the view that we have been stitched up good and proper by Wasps and the council working together. Because I want to keep going with my lad and because I want to support Mark Robins and the lads, this time I’m in.
Also CCC used some of EU's money under certain regulations. I am sure they would like to find a reason for getting part back
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Would take 8 years to get anywhere near football league status! WASPS only have a max of 2 years life left at the RICOH
twistandshout
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately our owners are not fans. Hedge funds distress to acquire assets cheap and sell for profit. CCFC currently are not costing them money, the only ways to make money is to distress Wasps or get us promoted .