Talks Back On.... (12 Viewers)

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
It matters not whether they are talking or not....it about a deal and playing in Coventry. This is worse than Brexit
That would depend on your perspective.....but that's an entirely separate debate. Does anyone know for sure what authority the EC will have when the democratic wishes of the people stop being subverted by the elitist politicians and we finally leave the EU? Might (selfishly) make me change my mind on wanting to respect the democratic process.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
This agreement introduced conditions that would unreasonably restrict the Club and SISU’s basic legal rights and would commit the Club and SISU to underwrite Wasps’ costs and any future damages. This would put the football club at great risk and jeopardise its future and in so doing, undermine the hard-work and success the Club has achieved over the past few seasons.

How can this be so when Mr Fisher and Mr Boddy have repeatedly said the football club are not Sisu.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
How can this be so when Mr Fisher and Mr Boddy have repeatedly said the football club are not Sisu.

exactly. Been told all along its SISU in the court battle. Surely Wasps condition wasn't that it was CCFC that indemnified them, it was the owners ?, unless the rental agreement was with the club and not the owners ?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

TTG

Well-Known Member
How has this got to 77 posts
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Because the agreement is with the football club
Correct me if I'm wrong and I'm sure you will .

Sisu, NOT the football club have taken the complaint to the EC over the sale of the Ricoh from the Council to Wasps, asking them to make a judgement on whether it's state aid or not.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
How has this got to 77 posts
Have you looked out side it's pising it down .

giphy.gif
 

6 Generations

Well-Known Member
Because the agreement is with the football club

But the request for the European Commission investigation was made by the owners of our club.
It was not as far as we are aware made by the football club.

Coventry City Football Club wish to continue to play its home games at the Ricoh.

According to Boddy and Fisher the football club are separate from the owners.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Yeah Tynan Scope said
“Wasps wanted SISU to sign up to and also sign the football club to sign up to simply was not possible by terms that were being presented.
 

Nick

Administrator
But the request for the European Commission investigation was made by the owners of our club.
It was not as far as we are aware made by the football club.

Coventry City Football Club wish to continue to play its home games at the Ricoh.

According to Boddy and Fisher the football club are separate from the owners.

What's your point? They also wanted the club to guarantee it.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
But the request for the European Commission investigation was made by the owners of our club.
It was not as far as we are aware made by the football club.

Coventry City Football Club wish to continue to play its home games at the Ricoh.

According to Boddy and Fisher the football club are separate from the owners.

Nothing stopping Wasps agreeing to us playing at the Ricoh then is there?
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Yeah Tynan Scope said
“Wasps wanted SISU to sign up to and also sign the football club to sign up to simply was not possible by terms that were being presented.
That may be so, but that is after SISU went to the European Commission .
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Correct me if I'm wrong and I'm sure you will .

Sisu, NOT the football club have taken the complaint to the EC over the sale of the Ricoh from the Council to Wasps, asking them to make a judgement on whether it's state aid or not.

The rental agreement is with wasps holdings and the football club so the clause will be against the club originally one would assume.
 

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
The rental agreement is with wasps holdings and the football club so the clause will be against the club originally one would assume.
My view is that only the company directly connected to CCFC and registered with companies house, at the time of the sale to Wasps by the council, would be in a position to raise the complaint to the EU.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
My view is that only the company directly connected to CCFC and registered with companies house, at the time of the sale to Wasps by the council, would be in a position to raise the complaint to the EU.

Which is not relevant to what I said
 

block16

Well-Known Member
What happens when we leave the EU and this case isn’t finished? Will they have to abide by the ruling of European court or not? Or does that depend on whatever deal/no deal is announced ?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
My view is that only the company directly connected to CCFC and registered with companies house, at the time of the sale to Wasps by the council, would be in a position to raise the complaint to the EU.
Not really, it's purely now a matter of the EC checking to see if the UK state has applied State Aid regulations properly. It doesn't matter that much about the company complaining for the purpose of the EC investigation
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
I hope it's proved that they got it on the cheap from a selfish point of view I wouldn't mind if we got it on the cheap

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I hope it's proved that they got it on the cheap from a selfish point of view I wouldn't mind if we got it on the cheap

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Some one posted on Facebook saying it's expected CCC/Wasps will lose this case, so they're looking at an out of court settlement.

Again, purely forwarding what has been posted, no idea on how true it is.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Some one posted on Facebook saying it's expected CCC/Wasps will lose this case, so they're looking at an out of court settlement.

Again, purely forwarding what has been posted, no idea on how true it is.
A settlement with who though? The EU? Sisu aren't taking this action it's an investigation. Sounds like a load of bullshit.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
A settlement with who though? The EU? Sisu aren't taking this action it's an investigation. Sounds like a load of bullshit.

If the complaint is upheld them I think it gets referred back to the courts of the member state involved.
I dont think there is a mechanism for an out of court settlement at least not at this stage
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
It’s the equivalent to grassing up the council, what would you suggest the remedies are? Why should we and even sisu cover the damages?
The two hedge funds are at war with each other and they have ever right to protect their assets,
And no the football club should not cover the damages.


The football club and the fans are just piggy in the middle .
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top