D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Go ahead, do what you want to do, and lay out what's happened on here and, if you're not going yourself, I'll happily back you up if I think it's worth querying... and if I think this time is the right time to do so.It does t even bother you that the secretary - roger Ellis - has to approve a motion and even if it gets that far 66% of attendees have to approve as policy?
I could put a motion together and have 500 trust members agree this and then it still gets rejected?
But I suspect the best way to get a change in approach is to show a unified approach and a coherant voice. I'm pretty sure that despite the jolly bickering you, BHSB and Tony are on similar pages wrt what the Trust should be doing, so it seems an ideal opportunity to get that voice across, no?
And process can indeed be an argument, but first the voice has to be made.