A few points.... I am only highlighting the way he was smeared by nearly every media outlet did not convince the people of America not to vote for him. It was an example of how established media are less powerful than they used to be in effecting outcomes and brainwashing those that struggle with independent analysis of a situation.
You missed misogynistic off your Trump slurs too btw!!
Not sure it gives your post much credibility when you call someone a racist and an orange skinned c*nt in the same sentence. Also when was Donald Trump convicted of sex offending again?
If we're talking about lying let's remember the American people were offered a binary choice between Trump and a political dynasty in the Clintons who frankly have a history of being anything but honest.
Sorry if my response to your post came across as a bit confrontational, but I really believe Trump is an odious specimen who should be held in the same regard as a litany of other leaders from the past who have been rightfully vilified. He seems to escape any serious condemnation because of the office he holds. He is extremely dangerous and - contrary to your views - is not being called out as a bully, a racist, and a potential mass murderer (climate change action obstruction as one example, Yemen another) by huge sections of the media.
A few points of my own:
You suggest my description of him as orange-skinned was racist. Get a grip. He is orange skinned because of his tanning regime. If you could just remind me which ethnic groups have orange skin apart from the Oompah Lumpahs, I'd love to hear it.
To say
nearly every media outlet was against him his ridiculous and untrue.
I agree that the established media is less powerful but he has plenty of friends in the established media, such as his fan club, AKA Fox News. He has successfully gained credibility precisely be vilifying the media and screaming about fake news - which is ironic considering he lies every time he opens his mouth or tweets.
You mistakenly refer to my
descriptions of him as slurs.
Are you seriously naive enough to imply that the reason he hasn't been convicted of sex offending is that the
16 women who have had the courage to come forward and make the complaints (there are doubtless many more who haven't spoken up) are all lying?
FFS. He hasn't been convicted because of the office he holds. He is not just a bully, but an extremely powerful one. Read up on the allegations made. If, after doing so, you don't believe any of them and believe the self-confessed "pussy-grabber", I would find it very hard to understand that position.
Your final point certainly rings true, but I think that 'political dynasty' might have had a different outcome in the election if it was a brother of Bill's, rather than a wife.
