Bright Enobakhare (14 Viewers)

Forums New posts
eastwoodsdustman

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
Whilst Bright did look good last season I can't see why Bayliss cant play that role at all. If he's free from the defensive duties that bogged him down I can't see why he can't do as well as bright did last year.
 
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
As time has passed, I’m more convinced Allen was the Bright replacement. We could possibly bring in a no.10 on loan as another option.
 
cooperskyblue

cooperskyblue

Well-Known Member
If we don't get bright, them 433 with Kelly sitting with Bayliss and Allen either side would be a great midfield 3 with a bit of everything to compliment each other.
 
Mr Panda

Mr Panda

Well-Known Member
I was getting worried that Bright would go to Birmingham then I saw Wayne 'the wicked man' Matthews from the Facebook forum say his mate who works at St. Andrews saw him walk through his office.

I now definitely think it's not happening.
 
S

SkyBlueCRJ

Well-Known Member
Mr Panda said:
I was getting worried that Bright would go to Birmingham then I saw Wayne 'the wicked man' Matthews from the Facebook forum say his mate who works at St. Andrews saw him walk through his office.

I now definitely think it's not happening.
Click to expand...

That bloke is an absolute gift. One man couldn't could sum up the Facebook forum better.
 
Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Thing is in league 1 bright is worth the mill.
Have a good season and get promoted city could make up to 10 times profit on him.

No brainer to put the cash into somebody of his ability
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
eastwoodsdustman said:
Whilst Bright did look good last season I can't see why Bayliss cant play that role at all. If he's free from the defensive duties that bogged him down I can't see why he can't do as well as bright did last year.
Click to expand...

I agree I can see Bayliss in that role as MR's back-up option. He'd play it differently to Bright but he could still be effective. He can carry the ball forward himself but can also play a good through ball.

ccfchoi87 said:
As time has passed, I’m more convinced Allen was the Bright replacement. We could possibly bring in a no.10 on loan as another option.
Click to expand...

I think Allen was brought in as a Bayliss replacement because he was either going to be sold or take up Bright's position if Bright didn't come back.
 
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I agree I can see Bayliss in that role as MR's back-up option. He'd play it differently to Bright but he could still be effective. He can carry the ball forward himself but can also play a good through ball.



I think Allen was brought in as a Bayliss replacement because he was either going to be sold or take up Bright's position if Bright didn't come back.
Click to expand...

Bayliss will not be 10. He’s brought Allen in to play 3 across the middle. Allen played in a 3 for Burton.
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
ccfchoi87 said:
Bayliss will not be 10. He’s brought Allen in to play 3 across the middle. Allen played in a 3 for Burton.
Click to expand...

Maybe. But of those three I'd still have Bayliss as the first one to be given 'free licence' to push forward and take on Bright's roles of carrying the ball. Allen can of course do it and had a superior scoring record to Bayliss, but he seems better equipped as a more box-to-box midfielder than I think MR was hoping to get from Bayliss last year but defensively didn't do enough.

I still think we'll play 4-2-3-1 at times, and if we do it'll likely be Bayliss pushed up into that role.
 
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Maybe. But of those three I'd still have Bayliss as the first one to be given 'free licence' to push forward and take on Bright's roles of carrying the ball. Allen can of course do it and had a superior scoring record to Bayliss, but he seems better equipped as a more box-to-box midfielder than I think MR was hoping to get from Bayliss last year but defensively didn't do enough.

I still think we'll play 4-2-3-1 at times, and if we do it'll likely be Bayliss pushed up into that role.
Click to expand...

Only if we sign a 10. We’ve played a midfield 3 including Bayliss in both pre-season games. If we had plans of using him there, you’d hope he’d have pre-season to try it.
 
cooperskyblue

cooperskyblue

Well-Known Member
ccfchoi87 said:
Only if we sign a 10. We’ve played a midfield 3 including Bayliss in both pre-season games. If we had plans of using him there, you’d hope he’d have pre-season to try it.
Click to expand...

Agree! I think 433 is what we will be looking at doing if we dont sign an out and out number 10. If Bright is a no go I wouldn't be surprised to see another winger come in.
 
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
cooperskyblue said:
Agree! I think 433 is what we will be looking at doing if we dont sign an out and out number 10. If Bright is a no go I wouldn't be surprised to see another winger come in.
Click to expand...

I think we’ll sign a striker for definite. If his heart is set on 4-2-3-1 we need a 10. Would anyone be surprised to see another right back come in?
 
AFCCOVENTRY

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Regardless of matching the price Birmingham offer it comes down to higher wages and a higher league. It’s a tough one to pull off.
 
mark82

mark82

Super Moderator
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Regardless of matching the price Birmingham offer it comes down to higher wages and a higher league. It’s a tough one to pull off.
Click to expand...

It definitely is. It depends on the player really. If it's more important to him to feel loved, I'm sure CCFC would be his preferred destination. It could also be better for his career long term.
If money is more important then he'll choose Birmingham (and if Birmingham are genuinely after him - seems pure speculation based on sightings of him, none of which actually look like him).

If it was me, I know what I'd do. I'd be pocketing that extra money.
 
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
C

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
Kieranp96 said:
Stand corrected, but even so y9u contradicted yourself why would we be in for another rb if we already have 2
Click to expand...

Who’s the second? Pask is a centre half who’s been brought into cover right back. If we could get a specialist with the funds left I think he might.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 15 (members: 0, guests: 15)
Top