Player of the season so far (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
ccfcway

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
CT suggesting it’s between Shipley and o’hare.

Discuss...
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Apart from the fact we're only into October so meaningless, but Mason and Kelly have to be in the reckoning surely?
 
pastythegreat

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
ccfcway said:
CT suggesting it’s between Shipley and o’hare.

Discuss...
Click to expand...
Mason. Been unplayable at times.
Also, Kelly, much the same as last season, it's no coincidence that our dip in form has been whilst hes been sidelined. Absolutely pivotal to our promotion push and so important we can keep him fit.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
Am I right I’m saying Shipley is our only ever present, talking league games. Not the most popular player on here but he’s been consistent so I’d edge it to him.
 
Esoterica

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
Considering we had a 10 game unbeaten run and are 3 points off the autos, it's surprisingly slim pickings!
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Esoterica said:
Considering we had a 10 game unbeaten run and are 3 points off the autos, it's surprisingly slim pickings!
Click to expand...

Were greater than the sum of our parts.

I actually find this encouraging because it shows we're a decent team, not reliant on one or two individuals and thus at the mercy of injuries and suspensions that could derail our season.

This is the fault I find in US sports - they can focus heavily on one or two individual 'franchise' players and if they get injured the teams entire season can be over. Plus it gives those individuals massive control and dominance in the changing room, which can be fine if they're a natural leader and motivator but if they're just an egomaniac it'll end in tears.

But they do that for a few reasons.
1. No threat of relegation and associated loss of income, plus they will get a better pick of the draft following year
2. Financially they can make more money off a couple of individuals. Bit like when teams over here have signed a random player from Asia to access that market rather than because he actually improves the squad.
 
Liquid Gold

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Were greater than the sum of our parts.

I actually find this encouraging because it shows we're a decent team, not reliant on one or two individuals and thus at the mercy of injuries and suspensions that could derail our season.

This is the fault I find in US sports - they can focus heavily on one or two individual 'franchise' players and if they get injured the teams entire season can be over. Plus it gives those individuals massive control and dominance in the changing room, which can be fine if they're a natural leader and motivator but if they're just an egomaniac it'll end in tears.

But they do that for a few reasons.
1. No threat of relegation and associated loss of income, plus they will get a better pick of the draft following year
2. Financially they can make more money off a couple of individuals. Bit like when teams over here have signed a random player from Asia to access that market rather than because he actually improves the squad.
Click to expand...
It's also becuase a quarterback is way more important than any player on the pitch. A good QB can make a bad team look good, a bad QB can make a good team awful.
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Liquid Gold said:
It's also becuase a quarterback is way more important than any player on the pitch. A good QB can make a bad team look good, a bad QB can make a good team awful.
Click to expand...

That is correct. But a bad O-line can make a good QB look bad as he's got no protection and gets sacked loads. As can poor wide receivers. Not having a decent RB can make it easier for a defence to guard against a QB and increase the chances of interceptions and turnovers because the QB is forced to throw the ball more often.

Don't get me wrong, the QB is pivotal and as an individual the most important member. But you take the best QB the world has ever seen and surround him with rubbish, he will look rubbish and his stats will look rubbish too.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It certainly won’t be anyone with attacking intent
 
harvey098

harvey098

Well-Known Member
Shipley -consistent and played some lovely passes

Marosi - completely transformed the way we play out of the back

Mason - valiant defending, very rarely gives it away going forward

I would’ve voted Westbrook if he’d played more but he’s been player of the season for me over the games he’s played in.
 
ccfcway

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Shipley certainly playing a greater role recently than o’hare. We can’t underestimate the impact a decent keeper has either
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
O'Hare?? Lol is that based on 3-4 games?

Kelly, Shipley, Dabo, Mason and Marosi have been outstanding this season.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It’s too early as if Godden starts to score goals forwards get the headlines

he’s a one in two game scorer at other clubs so could end up nearly on 20

Without Walsh in midfield I think we’d struggle a bit so I hope he’s not recalled
 
Covkid1968#

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
Arguments for so many players in so many different positions.... it’s a great problem to have.

Shippers or Marosi for me. But it could easily be 3 or 4 others.
 
pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Westbrooke.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top