Nick
Administrator
He got the penalty right though-the assistant gave the penalty.
So he should get credit for seeing something a few yards from him?
It reminds me of people cheering Burge catching a ball.
He got the penalty right though-the assistant gave the penalty.
I didn't think it was particularly marginal - he puts his arm out that far away from his body and then it hits his hand too rather than his upper arm. It's above shoulder height and he's made his body unnaturally bigger.
View attachment 13291
that's outrageous. And to happen two home games in a row is a piss take.
Teammate is irrelevant it's the ball position.
What if they had REALLY long legsYou are correct.
It'd be a rare occurrence whereby you'd be ahead of the ball but behind the teammate as they played it.
What if they had REALLY long legs
The line our side didnt seem to understand the basic rules like where he should be in line with the last man
I didn't think it was particularly marginal - he puts his arm out that far away from his body and then it hits his hand too rather than his upper arm. It's above shoulder height and he's made his body unnaturally bigger.
View attachment 13291
Another classic line “they can’t keep up with play” or “they are that far behind play” but I can see why people say that.It's happened loads of times this season, being sat on that side makes it easy to see just how far behind the game they keep being.
He absolutely shit himself when they scored because he had no clue.
So why did he stand there flapping with no idea? Why was the one with the handball the other week nowhere near in line?Another classic line “they can’t keep up with play” or “they are that far behind play” but I can see why people say that.
The assistants are always in line with the 2nd last defender and are looking across the pitch when a ball is played. The assistant then has to turn 90 degrees clockwise and start running towards the goal which will take him 0.5 to 1 second to adjust. If the attacker (who is about to receive the ball) is already sprinting, he can have probably made 4-5 meters in that short space of time (0.5-1 second) before the assistant has started his run and it looks as if the assistant hasn’t kept up with play.
But in reality the assistant had been in the correct position when the ball was played (ie in line with the 2nd last defender).
So why did he stand there flapping with no idea? Why was the one with the handball the other week nowhere near in line?
No-you were saying about them being behind play and I explained why it sometimes can look like that. But a couple of handballs should have been given over the last couple of games definitely.So why did he stand there flapping with no idea? Why was the one with the handball the other week nowhere near in line?
No problem with the penalty, as cast iron as you will see and yellow card correct.Adge comments on the ref today please
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
So you just going ignore our disallowed goal.which hitsvthee mans handNo problem with the penalty, as cast iron as you will see and yellow card correct.
Some of the other yellows you could say were very soft indeed.
I am never quick to criticise but I agree with most it wasn’t a great performance.
If everyone falls down and you’r’e 6’4” you’ll usually get the blameSo you just going ignore our disallowed goal.which hitsvthee mans hand
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Not if you have an owlIf everyone falls down and you’r’e 6’4” you’ll usually get the blame
On a serious note - is there anything we can do? Any genuine suggestions?
I’d like to see:
- written reasons for disallowed goals (handball, offside etc)
- written reasons for bookings and sendings off
- post match interviews of officials
- some kind of league or rating system for referees which decides what level they ref at (is this done already??)
Was thinking something like an e-petition but obviously that’s a government/ parliament thing
Think it was disallowed for hitting Bakas hand. The new law introduced this season as we know means that a goal can’t be scored if the ball hits the hand/arm even if it is accidental.So you just going ignore our disallowed goal.which hitsvthee mans hand
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Think it was disallowed for hitting Bakas hand. The new law introduced this season as we know means that a goal can’t be scored if the ball hits the hand/arm even if it is accidental.
Or the infamous “hand of God”?The ref indicated it was disallowed for hitting Bakayoko's hand, but there's no way the ref could have seen it, and it looked like he guessed. The TV pictures certainly look if it came off anyone's hand then it was the defender's.
There isn’t one.That was the excuse given. There is no way in hell they could see if it hit his hand. It certainly didn’t look like it and Robins said it didn’t and he’s usually quite up front.
Question: what’s the rule on benefit of the doubt generally?