CovUpNorth
Well-Known Member
Last edited by a moderator:
3 new sites identified by SISU/Council (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter CovUpNorth
- Start date
Nick
Administrator
What a misleading statement, why are the Trust randomly piping up now?
There must have been some stirrings about Wasps....
Remember when Maton suggested the site that already had houses on it?
Also, will the Trust publish the responses from the council or just go straight to the telegraph with their spin on it who also add their spin?
There must have been some stirrings about Wasps....
Remember when Maton suggested the site that already had houses on it?
Also, will the Trust publish the responses from the council or just go straight to the telegraph with their spin on it who also add their spin?
Last edited:
Nick
Administrator
Can Cov Council suggest Brandon if it's outside of their remit?
It's a poor attempt at a couple of Council and Wasps puppets to divert the attention from them. Is it just coincidence that this comes on a day when action against Wasps is featured on BBC news?
Briles
Well-Known Member
Maybe that's why they have appointed independent planners?
skyblueeyesrevisited
Well-Known Member
Birmingham, Burton and Northampton
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Where's the unedited Q&A referred to in the story?
Nick
Administrator
No, they are just using planners who haven't been involved in the litigation. It's spin.
Look forward to the Trust releasing the full Q and A.
Nick
Administrator
Still being written up by the Council and Wasps.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure I necessarily believe that tbf. I doubt very much that all is rosy in the Wasps / Council relationship given their various acts since 2014.
Briles
Well-Known Member
It'll just be the same as last year except SISU can't use the council being difficult as an excuse. Apparently.
With support by the waspograph news paper
Nick
Administrator
Just a massive coincidence they are published today after the Telegraph has seemed to ignore everything they can about the Wasps stuff?
It's a bit too obvious.
Reading through it, it isn't actually news is it?
The only thing is that SISU have put a site forward (Woodlands) and the Council have suggested a couple of other sites. Also another Thanks to Wasps from the Trust.
What else is new in that?
skyblueeyesrevisited
Well-Known Member
Was the meeting a chance encounter?
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Wasps/council to Wasps supporters group....,sorry, the sky blues trust,
"Hey guys, things are hotting up slightly in media against us.... can you get some SISU frothing going please.... we'll get you a box for Saturday!"
Trust to Wasps/Council,
"Certainly guys... leave it with us... ground/planning stuff ok again yeah!??... See you at the Ricoh for the game!"
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
You forgot the kisses at the end...
Nick
Administrator
It must have been, just like how it just happens to be published today while Wasps are coming in for a bit of stick and CJ seems to "know nothing about it".
Why didn't the Trust just publish the Q&A on their site rather than run to the Telegraph for it to be portrayed in a certain way?
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
No, it isn't really news. It seems to be a self-promotion piece from the Trust tbh "Look what we're doing, about [insert overly emotive language]"
That said, it is time that pressure is put on SISU about their plans for a new stadium in the absence of any movement from Wasps. I can't remember when the news about Woodlands came out but it was a long while ago, nothing has happened since.
skybluesam66
Well-Known Member
the only thing we can be sure of is that the trust who Purport to represent the supporters have only got self interest at heart
Nick
Administrator
Of course but the pressure should be done properly to try and get answers rather than for other reasons....
It doesn't actually say anything new, it just bigs up the Council and Wasps.
Surely the Trust would have just posted up the Q+A on their site so people can read and make a judgment?
Briles
Well-Known Member
Better to publicise it to the Mirror group and make it seem bigger than it actually is.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
The whole thing is a bit mixed up really, as it goes from talking about identifying sites for a new stadium to a return to the Ricoh. The potential new stadium has nothing to do with Wasps so not sure why they're referenced in the article. Probably just piss poor writing than any particular plan.
I doubt very much the club's owners will engage with the Trust any time soon.
Nick
Administrator
Because it's trying to put across that Wasps and the Council love the football club and are doing everything to help.
It will be followed up with "CCFC and SISU failed to speak to us" BOOOOO
IrishSkyBlue
Facebook User
must be a slow news day, they need to stop digging back up dead shit and trying get people in a spin about it, well all know its horse shit!
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Asgard is at least on Earth these days. Bit of a trek though.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
And yet you keep saying it
Honestly at this point if I were the Trust I’d make “and thanks to Wasps” my email signature just to trigger you each time.
CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
Don't know about you but I'll be at Sunderland on Saturday. Couldn't even tell you when Wasps are playing.
Nick
Administrator
You do realise the "roll CJ out to say he hates Wasps" stuff doesn't work?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Just stop the charade and reveal your lizard self CJ
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
any other comment cj?
Nick
Administrator
Could just post the video up of them applauding Wasps or the statements saying they were working with a consortium that Wasps were included in?
Nick
Administrator
Don't be silly.