Nationalisation is not a Looney left policy.
I , and others, have explained the reasons why many times so I'm going to repeat it but if you can be arsed to trawl through the thread you'll see our reasoning.
Rich businesses have not been bled, that is absolute claptrap.
The broadband project was unachievable according to experts They've also said the Tory broadband project is unachievable in the given timescale and HS2 is going ahead whoever is in government.
Nationalisation of rail and all utilities, together with free broadband for all and saying only the super rich will pay is ‘hard left’/‘looney left’
So is taking 10% of private limited companies and giving them to employees.
As was the underlying (longer term) threat to abolish all private schools.
There could be positive arguments for each of the above....but you would have to ignore the negatives/ramifications ie tens/hundreds of billions in costs (plus cost of borrowing), negative impact to pension schemes and investment into the UK, cost to public of schooling hundreds of thousands of additional
A lot of the rest of the manifesto would have been well supported (together with possibly a gradual returning of the railways into public hands)