Anyone Know this Chap? (18 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
And also has the funds to pay it back plus costs.
What are the odds on his money being in his name and accessible to the UK courts and not in dodgy shell companies and Caymen Islands accounts?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
No its just you still crying over labour being humiliated, time to take ya head out the clouds and realise the majority want Boris
The majority do not want Boris. But he was the least worse out of a bad bunch.

And he was offering what about half the UK wanted.....Brexit. Those against Brexit were shared between several parties. Another big help for Boris.

I still can't believe someone as bad as Boris is PM.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
What are the odds on his money being in his name and accessible to the UK courts and not in dodgy shell companies and Caymen Islands accounts?
How many homes does he own? How much wealth can be traced?

Should he be let off just in case they can't get the money back?

Take a look. Things have changed. They can claim money a lot more easily now.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
How many homes does he own? How much wealth can be traced?

Should he be let off just in case they can't get the money back?

Take a look. Things have changed. They can claim money a lot more easily now.

It’s ironic you’ve for ever lambasted Bryan Richardson yer failed you acknowledge why he really had to leave the club and why we then did anything and everything to stave off administration - had to as mike mginnity said to the best for the “local businesses who were owed money” - well one business based it seems in Balsall Common
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Argue with myself?

How about straight to the point....Or truth?

Someone pointed out a Labour MP was getting investigated. Was your first post about a Tory?

Yes...in response to a partisan hack calling someone else a partisan hack. Dim then proves the point by dismissing evidence against Boris as being part of an agenda.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
It’s ironic you’ve for ever lambasted Bryan Richardson yer failed you acknowledge why he really had to leave the club and why we then did anything and everything to stave off administration - had to as mike mginnity said to the best for the “local businesses who were owed money” - well one business based it seems in Balsall Common
And not ironic that you continually defended him yet had a go at those who tried to pick up the pieces of what he did.

Then you have a go at everything SISU has done whilst defending who started the whole debacle off. But that is nothing for someone like yourself who specialises in deflection.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Yes...in response to a partisan hack calling someone else a partisan hack. Dim then proves the point by dismissing evidence against Boris as being part of an agenda.
And as I have said to both of you the points put forward are biased. You only want to put one point across. He only wants to put the opposite point across. You are as bad as each other.

Not as bad as Grendell though IMHO.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Yes...in response to a partisan hack calling someone else a partisan hack. Dim then proves the point by dismissing evidence against Boris as being part of an agenda.

Fucking hell you love used the word dim, does it turn you on or something ahh? proper weird behavior like
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
And as I have said to both of you the points put forward are biased. You only want to put one point across. He only wants to put the opposite point across. You are as bad as each other.

Not as bad as Grendell though IMHO.

Bri being on the losing side makes him sound deluded though
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And not ironic that you continually defended him yet had a go at those who tried to pick up the pieces of what he did.

Then you have a go at everything SISU has done whilst defending who started the whole debacle off. But that is nothing for someone like yourself who specialises in deflection.

They didn’t pick up any pieces - just tried to pick up pieces of their own gold. With Geoffrey pulling the strings.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
And as I have said to both of you the points put forward are biased. You only want to put one point across. He only wants to put the opposite point across. You are as bad as each other.

Not as bad as Grendell though IMHO.

We all put across our own perspectives and these are shaped by experience. What frustrates me is being called a Labour activist or Corbyn fanboy when I criticised both for most of the year and did so in the past. Never campaigned for Labour and haven't always voted for them. There are loads of valid criticisms of Corbyn-I just find a lot of the ones offered here to be copy paste of what you can find in the Mail or the Telegraph. Still wanted him out months ago.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
They didn’t pick up any pieces - just tried to pick up pieces of their own gold. With Geoffrey pulling the strings.
They were left without CCFC having a home, no funds to buy HR back and the credit line to the max. Wages that couldn't be afforded. A signed agreement to rent HR back and payments made to keep a ground falling apart safe.....ish.


But yeah all the fault of those who followed your hero Richardson. Yeah have heard you enough before.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
We all put across our own perspectives and these are shaped by experience. What frustrates me is being called a Labour activist or Corbyn fanboy when I criticised both for most of the year and did so in the past. Never campaigned for Labour and haven't always voted for them. There are loads of valid criticisms of Corbyn-I just find a lot of the ones offered here to be copy paste of what you can find in the Mail or the Telegraph. Still wanted him out months ago.
But you had a go at me for a few years previously for saying what you now agree with. But you still jump on my posts for similar reasons.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
But you had a go at me for a few years previously for saying what you now agree with. But you still jump on my posts for similar reasons.

For saying what? A few years ago we had a manifesto with popular policy positions and Corbyn was campaigning for them with energy. For most of 2019 he's been shitting the bed.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They were left without CCFC having a home, no funds to buy HR back and the credit line to the max. Wages that couldn't be afforded. A signed agreement to rent HR back and payments made to keep a ground falling apart safe.....ish.


But yeah all the fault of those who followed your hero Richardson. Yeah have heard you enough before.

Your inability to absorb and assimilate information is truly fascinating
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
They created the pieces, this argument that they were hoodwinked by Richardson doesn't work either way.
Indeed. Their approach either suggests incompetence, or complicity. Neither is what you want at your football club.

Oh, and McGinnity did buy HR back.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I'll meet you for a pint tomorrow if you fancy.... Earlsdon?

Ha! I’d have a beer with you. I’m with my girls for the next few days though. I’ll raise a glass to you tho.

giphy.gif
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
For saying what? A few years ago we had a manifesto with popular policy positions and Corbyn was campaigning for them with energy. For most of 2019 he's been shitting the bed.
Energy?

Seen more energy in a morgue. Seen more passion in a failed relationship.

Many didn't notice because they were hearing what they wanted to hear.

2016? When those in higher education got offered everything then for it to be toned down when the cost was realised? And dropped for 2019. Then it was the turn of women that lost out on pension age rising. But getting the older vote failed.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Your inability to absorb and assimilate information is truly fascinating
Don't you mean my ability not to believe the bullshit you come out with?

So did Richardson do everything I said or would you like to point out where I was wrong? Of course not.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Indeed. Their approach either suggests incompetence, or complicity. Neither is what you want at your football club.

Oh, and McGinnity did buy HR back.
I agree. They continued the bad work after voting Richardson off the board. But by then we were homeless and seriously in debt. Most of the problems had already been created. At that stage it was stay in the Prem or have major problems financially. But as we all know it failed.

I didn't know we had bought back HR and can't find ant details. Have you got any details you could show me? Would give a different outlook on what happened if true.
 

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
I agree. They continued the bad work after voting Richardson off the board. But by then we were homeless and seriously in debt. Most of the problems had already been created. At that stage it was stay in the Prem or have major problems financially. But as we all know it failed.

I didn't know we had bought back HR and can't find ant details. Have you got any details you could show me? Would give a different outlook on what happened if true.
We didn’t buy highfield road back, a company owned by the McGinnity family bought the land to build on and rented it back to the club when the new ground was delayed. I think we were paying the same amount A YEAR to rent it back as what they’d paid for it in the first place. A nice little earner,
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top