So with this great team if we hail to get promoted who would you blame?
Progress on last season wouldn't necessarily mean we would get promoted. If we don't get promoted then that means that Robins should go? I wouldn't agree with that. Everyone of the players in the team on Saturday was either signed by Robins or was introduced into the team by him. If you think that this team is good enough to be promoted, then who takes the credit for that?
You were pedalling the same argument two years ago before promotion from the fourth division was secured. Any fallow period (in this case, one game, the defeat by Shrewsbury, which followed the great Cup result at Ipswich), sees yourself and others casting doubt on Robins abilities.
Now considering that we all presumably want the same thing, a successful, entertaining team, it just baffles me why this keeps happening. Considering the disaster that the fire and hire policy with regard to managers since PL relegation, why do you and others think that starting on that road again will suddenly lead to success?
Robins has a plan (buy or develop players on the cheap, sell on for a profit and use some of the proceeds to improve the team). He has a definite pattern of play which suits the players and which they appear to have bought into. We have made progress year on year with Robins. We play entertaining football. We are winning a lot more than we are losing. We don't in fact lose often
Why would you get rid of the person that has brought about this transformation in our fortunes in the vague and probably forlorn hope that someone else just may do better?
Considering the state of the club and where we play, it is only Robins that has given us a glimmer of hope. Yet you and a few others try to wheedle away at this slither of positivity. I don't understand why.