Is it not worth a poll ?
I) are you a member of SBT ?
2) do you agree with their current approach ?
Is it not worth a poll ?
I) are you a member of SBT ?
2) do you agree with their current approach ?
I did a series of polls in the summer - no one outside of here gave a fuck
There have been some, even on Twitter there were hundreds who said they aren't representing them.Is it not worth a poll ?
I) are you a member of SBT ?
2) do you agree with their current approach ?
Genuine question- when was the last time the trust actually created a successful outcome? I'm not counting protests that failed, btw.
There have been some, even on Twitter there were hundreds who said they aren't representing them.
Strange, no notice was taken.
Just put one up.
@Nick How many hits a day does SBT get? It seems significant, for a club of our size to me. If that is correct and this poll turns out one way or another, surely it would paint something?
There have been some, even on Twitter there were hundreds who said they aren't representing them.
Strange, no notice was taken.
I can't get my head around the Trust at all. Wasn't Neil outed as saying fans were thick or idiots last year?
How come they enter into little to no dialogue on here? It makes sense that for anything to be succesful they've got to be open to debate and so on? They cant claim to represent the fans which such small numbers of membership compared to the amount of fans? Never see them at games? Never see them flyering or touting for memberships?
The two protests / marches in town were very good, although I wouldn't say they had much to do with a successful outcome.Genuine question- when was the last time the trust actually created a successful outcome? I'm not counting protests that failed, btw.
Yep, people on forums are idiots..
Yep, Neil keeps ignoring it completely.Its an absolutely ridiculous article as the only thing it doesn't mention is the one thing that needs to happen to get us back in Cov!
They can't claim ignorance as they've had people repeatedly requesting they go after Wasps on the indemnity but they are just ignoring it. They even give a pat on the back to the council and Wasps while criticising the club.
Beyond a joke.
Yep, people on forums are idiots.
He refuses to engage with people, when he does he just embarrasses himself and gets found out.
Is that correct?SBT (the forum) has 7,500 members and I would say has more active members as of now than the Trust - therefore a larger voice of the fans
Yet the 20 people who sit in the pub and pat each other on the back and representative.That's lunacy. That kind of comment from someone in his position, in any organisation would normally result in them stepping down.
Forums, like social media are open to people from all walks of life and people who all have different opinions. We've all disagreed with each other loads of times. Doesn't mean we are idiots...just different!
Do the 20 include all of their alter egos?Yet the 20 people who sit in the pub and pat each other on the back and representative.
He has no intention of engaging with fans, just doing a pr job and a very obvious one at that.
Covered by an NDA probably.The 3 specific sites the council has discussed with the club's agents are?
It would be the council who have acted illegally with wasps the beneficiary of that act. Hence no legal action has been, or will be, taken against wasps.The trust really are out if touch fans who are doing nothing for the best long term interests of the club they profess to care about. Why not pressure wasps about their desire for CCFC to indemnify them just in case they are found to have acted illigally with the help of the council? That angle requires work and a level of intellectual cunning to see what potentially might have gone on. Far easier to be anti SISU than consider other avenues and the CET mop it up like a porn star with a broken washing machine.
In a digital age surely other methods of interaction between supporters should be considered alongside the 7pm in a local pub crowd every now and again!
It would be the council who have acted illegally with wasps the beneficiary of that act. Hence no legal action has been, or will be, taken against wasps.
I’m happy one can argue the toss about whether it’s legal action or not. I think given the ccfc statement and wasps lack of comment that we can assume the content of the ccfc statement is correct. Another thing I’m struggling to understand is why the non disclosure agreement? Who does it protect and for what reason?It would be the council who have acted illegally with wasps the beneficiary of that act. Hence no legal action has been, or will be, taken against wasps.
You’ve been cyber muggedI joined the trust last week. As I wanted to actually hear what they do. CJ very kindly did it over email. (due to you not being able to do it online) and then has to pass the details to someone else to set up membership
Unfortunately that was the last iv heard. No login details or anything. It should not be that hard to even join.....
I'm a member but as far as I'm aware these days the only way to be active is to turn up for one of their increasingly rare Monday evening meetings. Think they get about 20 people there.Neil said the Trust has 2,700 members. I wonder how many are active.
Some openness is selective?Covered by an NDA probably.
That's the issue with 20 regulars meeting now and again becomes an echo chamber!!I'm a member but as far as I'm aware these days the only way to be active is to turn up for one of their increasingly rare Monday evening meetings. Think they get about 20 people there.
Besides that you're lucky to even get a email saying what they're up to let alone be asked for any input. Any members who try to put forward an opinion get ignored.
Yes there is, the FSA. Their National Council includes former Trust secretary Roger Ellis.Or is there any sort of over reaching body that liases with trusts,