That article makes a lot of sense. One thing that is clear to everyone is that the figure they’ve pumped in (not all of which may have been declared as loans and not all of which may be included in any asking price to sell) is some way different to the £20m you’re chucking around. But let me think... hmm, professional accountant with ample expertise in the field, it’s his job to analyse these things v Grendel, who literally doesn’t know one end of St Andrews from the other?
You don’t seem to grasp that there is a vast array of ways to present figures differently & a vast number of ways in which companies can structure themselves to allow for moving around of figures.
Not being funny but I think I’ll pass on your opinions on this one