Reading (6 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
So somebody killed 3 and maimed 2, and there may be no reason at all? Really? Have you heard yourself?
As far as I'm concerned, whether the media will call it a "terror" attack or not, it's exactly that. Somebody caused mass terror. Whether they were working alone, on behalf of an organisation or just fucking nuts, the outcome was terror. People would have been terrified for their lives! Why cant we say what we see without people being offended all the fuclung time?

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

A terrorist attack isn’t anything that causes terror you lemon, or Alton Towers would be one. It’s political violence with an intended aim of changing policy. Plenty of nutters stab multiple people and have done before Islamic terrorists started.

People saying calm down and wait for facts also isn’t being offended. The only offended people in this thread seem to be the ones being told to wait for facts.
 

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Anyway, in going out now if that's ok with the forum police, so got my condemnation in before the usual suspects call me a usual suspect
 

Nick

Administrator
No need for people to be so desperate when the police were saying different, that's the weird shit and is more political than saying what's been reported.
Nobody was being desperate. It was pretty obvious it was a terror attack.

Maybe dod has gone to give him a cuddle because it's a mental issue and he's a lovely guy? Maybe help rehabilitate him.

I'd put a bullet between his eyes and throw him in the sea.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Taking bets on whether a multiple murder was an act of terror? That's a new low.
I'm tapping out on this thread, let the police do their work.

Yeah, you're tapping out of this thread because you know the outcome is not what you want.

That was entirely predictable and so was your faux outrage about me 'taking bets'.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Nobody was being desperate. It was pretty obvious it was a terror attack.

Maybe dod has gone to give him a cuddle because it's a mental issue and he's a lovely guy? Maybe help rehabilitate him.

I'd put a bullet between his eyes and throw him in the sea.

WTF nick? All I said was we needed to wait until we have the fucking evidence. why fucking lie about what I said.

Give your head a wobble mate, your making us all look bad.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
A terrorist attack isn’t anything that causes terror you lemon, or Alton Towers would be one. It’s political violence with an intended aim of changing policy. Plenty of nutters stab multiple people and have done before Islamic terrorists started.

People saying calm down and wait for facts also isn’t being offended. The only offended people in this thread seem to be the ones being told to wait for facts.

Exactly and you get Nick spewing out a bit of revisionist history.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
It was clearly an act of terror.

No need for the politics crew to try and make it all about their weird bullshit like everything else.

It just makes them look silly, no doubt they will revert to "gammon" type nonsense when they turn out to be wrong, again.
It clearly wasn't seen as an act of terror at first though, Nick, as the police said they were not treating it as terror related.
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
It clearly wasn't seen as an act of terror at first though, Nick, as the police said they were not treating it as terror related.
The police always say it's not until.they have all the facts. They would hate to offend the snowflake brigade! They might use hurty words towards them!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I'll give you a bit of ccfc history if you want?

What you got was people saying it was a terror attack about what was a terror attack.

where did I say it wasn't? I said you needed to wait.

Also Greggs said it was racial and related to the rally.

so why lie Nick?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The police always say it's not until.they have all the facts. They would hate to offend the snowflake brigade! They might use hurty words towards them!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

Thought you were off to enjoy Fathers day mate?
 

Nick

Administrator
It clearly wasn't seen as an act of terror at first though, Nick, as the police said they were not treating it as terror related.
Did they rule out it being terror related? Not being funny but reading reports last night it was pretty obvious it was.

They never confirm it instantly.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It clearly wasn't seen as an act of terror at first though, Nick, as the police said they were not treating it as terror related.

Well other than the fact they were raiding his flat with full terrorist response gear on
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
The police always say it's not until.they have all the facts. They would hate to offend the snowflake brigade! They might use hurty words towards them!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
I don't think that is right, patsy. They don't usually say it isn't. They usually say the motive is not clear at this point, or words to that effect.

They don't usually say they don't believe it to be terror related.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I don't think that is right, patsy. They don't usually say it isn't. They usually say the motive is not clear at this point, or words to that effect.

They don't usually say they don't believe it to be terror related.

Patsy lies Otis
 

Nick

Administrator
I don't think that is right, patsy. They don't usually say it isn't. They usually say the motive is not clear at this point, or words to that effect.

They don't usually say they don't believe it to be terror related.
Did they say it wasn't and rule it out?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top