Tommo1993
Well-Known Member
Never really been the right moment!
Yeah I suppose so. But still, carpé diem, I never bloody learn.
Never really been the right moment!
Did the BBC reporter at 6 just say the killer approached "the gay men " or the "8 men" in the park ?
My hearing's not brilliant sometimes but I hope they didn't say " gay" . Its irrelevant .
Absolutely right. But I thought no, they must have said "8" because if they said "gay " they would have then added that police were looking into the possibility that you put forward, but they didn't. It seemed totally without context.It is relevant if they think that’s part of the reason they were attacked which I’ve seen suggested.
Absolutely right. But I thought no, they must have said "8" because if they said "gay " they would have then added that police were looking into the possibility that you put forward, but they didn't. It seemed totally without context.
Speculation. Could’ve just killed a gay man by chance.
Unless there was some sort of pride event going on how would the attacker know?Everyone has been quick to point out though at this minute there’s no suggestion that the men were targeted specifically because of their sexuality.
Fucking hell, have we been assigned to the case?Before we go too far down this route we need to bear in mind he was on MI5s radar.
Do we know whether he targeted this group or just went into the park and attacked the first group he came across? If he ignored other people on the way to the killings then he may well have had them in mind but I've no idea of where in the park this took place and the proximity of others to the killer at the time.
Fucking hell, have we been assigned to the case?
I'm too old for this shitNot you, you are too much of a renegade that refuses to play by the rules. We need this one done by the book.
Not you, you are too much of a renegade that refuses to play by the rules. We need this one done by the book.
Not you, you are too much of a renegade that refuses to play by the rules. We need this one done by the book.
Not seen this mentioned on the thread but its being reported that intelligence agency sources believe he had mental health problems. Also saw a news report where they'd spoken to his neighbours who said he had regular visits from the local mental health team.
If it turns out that mental health issues played a part I really hope its not going to be down to sticking someone vulnerable in prison where he's been radicalised for lack of a better term.
If you want, but whatever the outcome, I'd have him hung, slowly.Fucking hell, have we been assigned to the case?
When you say he was on MI5's radar, he was brought to the attention of the security services last year because of a rumour about him investigating going to Syria (or Libya, depending on which version you read).Before we go too far down this route we need to bear in mind he was on MI5s radar.
Do we know whether he targeted this group or just went into the park and attacked the first group he came across? If he ignored other people on the way to the killings then he may well have had them in mind but I've no idea of where in the park this took place and the proximity of others to the killer at the time.
He always gets the result in the end.Not you, you are too much of a renegade that refuses to play by the rules. We need this one done by the book.
Not seen this mentioned on the thread but its being reported that intelligence agency sources believe he had mental health problems.
Bit insulting that articles are being published with the guys family saying how he was a "lovely lad".
Yeah, top bloke.
He always gets the result in the end.
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
it was his last day on the force. Was going to retire with his old lady. Get a little place in the mountains, do a little fishing, now it’s all gone