Well I'd rather it was arbitrated than released as a PR game. Last time we got different perspectives depending on how and why information was releasedEh? I'm simply saying that they have been asked a direct question and have given a direct answer, that being they would agree to lift it if others did. It takes some incredible mental gymnastics to somehow spin this into some sort of 'typical SISU' take. What should she have said in response to the question? Would you have preferred no, or perhaps no reply.
I've no idea what you want here. I think what you're saying is, that even if the club have evidence that categorically proves Wasps are lying and negotiated in bad faith, even if it was beyond question, you'd still rather not see it. Well I would, so we'll just disagree
I was responding to a post! As it happens I misunderstood the meaning, but frankly your own lack of awareness suggests you're not in a position to patronise.Maybe in the future do your own research and have all the facts before making a sweeping inaccurate statement
I think it’s quite different but see what you’re saying. Think this is a key moment but not a silver bulletWell I'd rather it was arbitrated than released as a PR game. Last time we got different perspectives depending on how and why information was released
Wow just wow and I’ve said that about 6 times in the last two days
I was responding to a post! As it happens I ministries the meaning, but b frankly n your n own lack of awareness suggests you're not in a position to patronise.
I see the same patterns, just presented differently.I think it’s quite different but see what you’re saying. Think this is a key moment but not a silver bullet
Wow just wow and I’ve said that about 6 times in the last two days
Seriously, stop now before you embarrass yourselfWasn't ment to be patronising more that if you are going to comment on things try and have all the facts that's all rather than going off someone else opinion because it matches your own blinkered view
I see the same patterns, just presented differently.
Seriously, stop now before you embarrass yourself
Not really. You're showing yourself up however. The binaries are common in this board...Only one person doing that here mate
Not really. You're showing yourself up however. The binaries are common in this board...
Wow just wow and I’ve said that about 6 times in the last two days
Wait until I tell you that even the majority of those on the Facebook forum seem to finally be grasping it!
Fair enough. I like the way you think and it’s so important fans don’t live within their own little echo chambersI see the same patterns, just presented differently.
Wow just wow and I’ve said that about 6 times in the last two days
Dick Emery is in the house?Fair enough. I like you
I have edited it it sent before I finished lolDick Emery is in the house?
Have a like for the cauliflower ears reference aloneExactly. Wasps claim no indemnity was requested. All the club have to do is produce a document that contradicts that and it's check mate. Wasps will not lift the NDA, they're up to their cauliflower ears in a pool of bullshit.
Tell you what, wish people listened to me when I warned when SISU came in. Also wished people listened when I said Northampton want as straightforward as it was presented (no, I'm not Tim Fisher!)I have edited it it sent before I finished lol
Ask your councillor? Oh you can’t you’ll have to go through the comms team as they’ve stopped individual councillors replyingIt’s been suggested that Coventry city council could be propping up wasps financially. Could this really happen with tax payers money? I don’t believe it could be the case.... could it?
It’s been suggested that Coventry city council could be propping up wasps financially. Could this really happen with tax payers money? I don’t believe it could be the case.... could it?
Highly doubtful however if meant by financial injections with nothing in return.now that would be the “smoking gun” I would think
You’d think a simple foi would sort that. Certainly a question to ask Cllr Duggins and Martin reeves when we meet upHighly doubtful however if meant by financial injections with nothing in return.
Unless by propping up, that would include payment holidays etc - not unusual under Covid.
It's pretty obvious CCC are invested politically in the Wasps project, so hardly a shock they'd do what they could to preserve it, but I doubt it'd even get to Coombe Abbey levels, although there is a precedent for support there, support in that way would be highly unusual for a sports team to end up state controlled!
Commercial confidentiality - FOIs tell you little once economics is involved.You’d think a simple foi would sort that. Certainly a question to ask Cllr Duggins and Martin reeves when we meet up
Worth askingCommercial confidentiality - FOIs tell you little once economics is involved.
Again, it's open to interpretation really. Martin Reeves turns up to Ricoh events, and it's obvious they see the Wasps project as mutually beneficial for it to succeed.
Wasps silent today ?
Strange that isn’t it,you would think after Dave Boddy statement they would be coming back surely to argue their point ?
Finally they are being seen for what they are & this is just the start of it once this ball starts rolling who knows where it could end up we are on the front foot
I feel Wasps & council know what’s coming we just need to be patient.
Also interesting!
Someone who seems to enjoy making CCC life awkward. Various local campaigns/cases against Council. Usually proved right.Forgive my ignorance, but who’s Richard Heneghan?