I think its really important to separate the loan from the purchase of ACL. They are 2 separated and distinct things. I appreciate this may not be the case in clever accounting rules, but it is the facts that sisu are challenging CCC through EU complaint. The loan was am existing liability of ACLs. In order to buy the shares they paid £5.5m to the existing share holders, and then 1m 5o ccc to extend the lease.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Except the loan forms an integral part of the share valuation at the sale date so it cannot be ignored if sisu are challenging the sale value of the ccc shares. Not about clever accounting. The repayment might be a separate event but the loan cannot be ignored
The list I put up was a timeline nothing more. It is also reasonable to assume that if the lease extension was discussed so too would the loan repayment. But thats an opinion
Ccc were repaid but the indebtedness of acl remains because that company now owes part of the bond
I have asked the question before. What exactly is the detail of the complaint? If it is simply the value of the extension then no need to discuss share value or loan. However if the share value is challenged then you cannot ignore the loan because lease and loan are part of what was used to arrive at that value.
As far as i am aware no one has seen the detail of the complaint