Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
I thought it was generally accepted that we had no hope of getting him back following his contract being extended so why is the rumour mill up and running again?
Now that Magwitch is being called Maggers, it's fairly obvious he must be a player (Shipley=Shipperz), therefore explaining his ITK status. If Maggers says Walshy is coming, it's in the bag(gers)After the tactical genius of Dabo in CM, we’ve all decided Magwitch is a credible source.
This truly is an educational threadWe need a Walsh type player, and Walsh isn’t featuring in pre season, and even if he wasn’t injured, he is unlikely to be in the starting line up come he start of the season, hence maybe we could persuade Bristol to sell him.
So it’s a case of people putting 2 and 2 together, and coming up with 4.
The fucking A holes!
Maggers! ?!?Maggers said it's on. And he's already got walker right. So it's as good as done
Maggers said it's on. And he's already got walker right. So it's as good as done
We need a Walsh type player, and Walsh isn’t featuring in pre season, and even if he wasn’t injured, he is unlikely to be in the starting line up come he start of the season, hence maybe we could persuade Bristol to sell him.
So it’s a case of people putting 2 and 2 together, and coming up with 4.
The fucking A holes!
We need a Walsh type player, and Walsh isn’t featuring in pre season, and even if he wasn’t injured, he is unlikely to be in the starting line up come he start of the season, hence maybe we could persuade Bristol to sell him.
So it’s a case of people putting 2 and 2 together, and coming up with 4.
The fucking A holes!
He got Walker right after he'd been announced of courseMaggers said it's on. And he's already got walker right. So it's as good as done
He got Walker right after he'd been announced of course
Hasn't he just had his 1 year extension exercised by the club as it was in their favour to do so and not the players choice.If he has extended his contract then another years loan is plausible?
For me it's always been wishful thinking
I don't buy this we have hamer we don't need Walsh crap
Hamer looks good but too soon to say he as good as Walsh
Also squad depth is vital. Is Kelly going to play week in week out?
Walsh was important cog in promotion. I hope robins has an eye on bringing him back
Once again i thibk its way too early to make judgements like that. Simply not seen enough of hamer yet for me to comment either way on that one as to what kind of defensive job he could doSo we would spend over a mil each on walsh and hamer and one of them would sit on the bench they are far too similar to play together in the box formation, we need a player like Kelly next to a player like Walsh/hamer otherwise our midfielder would get overrun
Once again i thibk its way too early to make judgements like that. Simply not seen enough of hamer yet for me to comment either way on that one as to what kind of defensive job he could do
will be down to Walsh, if he pushes for the move we’ll get him
Sorry Maggers is Magwitch yeah. The famous prophet who said 3 were coming in soon. Sheaf, walker and an unknown which has now been revealed to be Walsh.
Walker in
Sheaf still talking
Walsh - next?
LD
True dat.No way would we be getting Sheaf AND Walsh. It'd be one or the other. They play in the same position and we've got Hamer and Kelly there already.
Fuck sheaf don’t even want him anymore rather we got a loan in as coverNo way would we be getting Sheaf AND Walsh. It'd be one or the other. They play in the same position and we've got Hamer and Kelly there already.
Rather have a loan than a potential permanent 3 year deal? OddFuck sheaf don’t even want him anymore rather we got a loan in as cover
The kid is a prat wanting guarantees etc fuck it offRather have a loan than a potential permanent 3 year deal? Odd
You have no idea what he wants, it's all just gossipThe kid is a prat wanting guarantees etc fuck it off
The kid is a prat wanting guarantees etc fuck it off