Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
It’s a big talking point which is kind of the purpose of a football forum no?
Marosi (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter JulianDarbyFTW
- Start date
Hobo
Well-Known Member
No Wilson has been our back up in the Championship so far. Robins saying we need to try and bring someone in as cover as we are down to one fit keeper - doesnt automatically mean the person coming in will go ahead of Wilson. It may be that we cant bring someone in anyway. The club must have some faith in Wilson as he has been our back up to date rather than bring someone in in the summer.
Hobo
Well-Known Member
The evidence is the club have had Wilson so far as back up. So they must have some faith in his ability to take the gamble in the summer not to bring anyone in.
Skybluefaz
Well-Known Member
If you don't have a big budget, you don't waste £'s on a back up keeper who may not be needed. Wilson is Burge level. Robins is not going to come out and say we're getting a keeper in because Wilson is shite either is he?
Mcbean
Well-Known Member
Yes ! Agreed but some of the comments seem in the fb group level IRWT
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Not according to the manager who has said he’s going to look to do something
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Burge is a better keeper than Wilson from what I have seen. I'd be content with Burge playing whilst Marosi was injured (if he was still at the club of course)
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He said he does t know the rules so will try to
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
We brought him in because he was a cheap option. There's a reason why he's 28 and played little over 60 games throughout his whole career.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
About 6'4", dark hair. Generally good character, always buys a round for his mates but occasionally forgets to tip in restaurants.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Wilson has only played 29 league games and he’s nearly 29 which suggests he’s really not up to standard at all
Jesse Carver
Well-Known Member
List of current free agent keepers
Free agents
In dieser Übersicht werden alle Spieler aufgeführt, die derzeit keine Verträge besitzen und somit Vertragslos sind.www.transfermarkt.co.uk
Nyland shares an agent with Østigård - Jim Solbakken who seems to represent most Norwegians with any talent, he was also Haaland's agent until he signed with Raiola. If Leo's happy here could that hold sway?
jordan210
Well-Known Member
EPL don’t allow emergency loans
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
In terms of bringing in a temporary replacement I think the overarching issue is more with regards to available funds rather than whether the club has the sway to bring in a player.
AFCCOVENTRY
Well-Known Member
From what I’ve read we can’t do an emergency loan. So free agent is what we need to get. Might be some willing to play for free to earn a deal. Never know. So many players out of contract.
jordan210
Well-Known Member
This is my understanding of the rules too.
It all depends if someone can argue that Wilson isn't a pro. He has only made 1 app for us in 2 years in league. But the rules are not crystal clear on what makes a player a full pro.
But has he has 20 odd games in EFL you would guess they would class him as one.
So a free agent is probs our best bet. Esp if Marko is out 6 weeks+ but will all depend on funds we can make available in a quick space of time.
Issue we have is we need cover for Wilson unless we call up Bilson from U23's
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
I would hope this is the kind of situation where the club has some rainy day funds. We cannot be going into this group of important fixtures with Wilson in goal.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
That cup we was in last season didn’t he also make a massive mistake
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Usually I think we would do. But given the financial predicament all clubs are in at the minute, I think rainy day funds are probably something of a luxury.
jordan210
Well-Known Member
EFL Official Website - Section 6 - Players
www.efl.com
Rule 57 if you want to try and work it out.
57 Emergency Goalkeeper Loan
57.1 If all the Professional Goalkeepers at a Club are unavailable as a result of having been:
57.1.1 certified by an independent medical practitioner as being unfit to play;
57.1.2 suspended; or
57.1.3 called up to play for his national association representative matches in accordance with the requirements of FIFA as laid down from time to time,
a Club may register (either before or after the deadlines laid down in Regulations 43.2 and 43.3), a further goalkeeper on a short term basis in accordance with the following provisions.
57.2 The Club must supply to The League written evidence to demonstrate the circumstances set out in Regulation 57.1 apply, together with the appropriate form(s) for his registration and The League having confirmed that the circumstances conform to the provisions of this Regulation:
57.2.1 in respect of any fixture played on a weekday when the Office is normally open, at least three hours before the match; or
57.2.2 in respect of any other fixture:
(a) 12 noon on the day of the match; or
(b) at least three hours before the match,
whichever is the earlier.
Guidance
Medical evidence cannot be accepted from anyone connected to the Club, nor is it acceptable to obtain a report from another Club’s club doctor.
Goalkeepers that have been deemed unavailable cannot be named on a team sheet during the loan period.
Goalkeepers on an Emergency Goalkeeper loan may be recalled by their Parent Club during the period of the loan in exceptional circumstances and subject to the approval of the League (i.e. as per the similar rights in the context of Standard Loans of goalkeepers).
Clubs should be aware that the Premier League does not permit Premier League Clubs to send goalkeepers on seven day emergency loans into the EFL.
57.3 The period of any Emergency Goalkeeper Loan:
57.3.1 shall be for a period of seven days, inclusive of the starting date and finishing date; and
57.3.2 may be renewed for seven days at a time, subject to compliance with Regulation 57.2 in respect of each proposed renewal.
57.4 Any goalkeeper registered under the provisions of this Regulation must be included in the starting 11 on the Team Sheet, and must start the Match
57.5 The provisions of Regulation 54.4.2 shall not apply to an Emergency Goalkeeper Loan.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I think getting either Rob Elliott (released by Newcastle in the summer) or Camp in on a pay as you play would work best and most likely to be accepted.
better days
Well-Known Member
If Wilson and Bilson are on full time contracts they will be classed as pro footballers for sure
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
I would rather Bilson in goal if so,can’t we sign out of contract players like Lee camp etc ?
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Makes sense
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Yeah we aren’t getting around that. Need a free agent willing to use us to get some fitness and put himself in the shop window
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I will give him a chance, but won't be optimistic...
That said, Marosi's been a bit shaky this season anyway.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Time for a good old fashioned goalkeeper COVID party. Get em all infected and isolating for two weeks.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
When was the last time the rule was updated? If it's the same when we got Stockdale in we should be able as I'm sure we could have just played LOB then.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
O'Brien was injured as well.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Bollocks.
ovduk78
Well-Known Member
No, think it was something else he'd injured!