It’s always bittersweet looking at old photos of Cov.
So much history, but such a shame what we have lost.
But at the same time it makes that which is left more special. If it was all still medieval and historic it'd be taken for granted. Take somewhere like Stratford, full of old medieval structures yet because it's all like that it's not appreciated as much as it would be here for example.
I'm no fan of the post-war modernist buildings, but at the same time I wouldn't want it all to be removed. Just in the future when just a handful remain they'll be more appreciated and they'll hopefully be the best examples of the type and you won't have the 'dross' - would you want, say, the Brittania or Priory halls listed?
There's actually a lot more historical stuff left that people realise but due to a mix of bombing and planning it's all spread out so doesn't make an impact or give the impression of our history that it should. There's timber framed buildings around the cathedral and in the Burges that were 'modernised' in Victorian times with a brick facade. There's FGS and Upper Spon St/Spon End, as well as 'medieval' Spon St.
I've always thought that you could use the area between the three spires would be great for creating a medieval conservation area that you could recreate the feel of the city in those days (narrow streets and lanes etc) than you can do in situ in the modern city. Move those ancient structures into that area like they did post-war on Spon St, but with more of a plan than as a 'dumping ground' because they couldn't knock them down. I think it'd be a far more effective home for FarGo than out of the main city centre area where it is.
I know this would be costly, but it would be offset by the freeing up of so much space without being encumbered by having to build around and be sympathetic to these historic buildings. Plus the impact of the buildings all being together would give Coventry a better feeling of its medieval history and appeal to certain tourists. So get developers to pay to move them in exchange for more freedom in what they want to build in terms of materials, height etc. It's basically a specific S106 agreement (which as far as I can tell is basically a legal bribe).
Sorry, got a bit carried away there. Urban planning is one of my other hobbies.