Referee Analysis Stoke (2 Viewers)

JulianDarbyFTW

Well-Known Member
Thought it was a nailed on handball for us, disliked the assault on Allen when he must have bounced for 10 yards, but also liked him allowing Hamer to do 2 late challenges in the space of five seconds. 7 out of 10 from me too.
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
With regards to the pen shout. What is the actual wording of the law?
It was one of those that’s worth a shout but would be really mad to see given against us.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
With regards to the pen shout. What is the actual wording of the law?
It was one of those that’s worth a shout but would be really mad to see given against us.


The key criteria are these 2...

- deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, including moving the hand/arm towards the ball

- the hand/arm has made their body unnaturally bigger


Clear as day that it was neither & so never a penalty in a million years & anyone claiming otherwise is clutching at straws.

All those saying it would definitely be given against us obviously doesn't remember the Reading game either.
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
Thanks. I was just being lazy
The key criteria are these 2...

- deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, including moving the hand/arm towards the ball

- the hand/arm has made their body unnaturally bigger


Clear as day that it was neither & so never a penalty in a million years & anyone claiming otherwise is clutching at straws.

All those saying it would definitely be given against us obviously doesn't remember the Reading game either.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top