I think it's a lot easier to overhaul the music industry than it is the financial industry, which is orders of magnitude larger and more powerful, and offers huge risks to investors in ways that other industries don't. The appetite to spend all day on RobinHood is going to disappear quite quickly for the casual investor during the next prolonged market correction, and without them I don't see how retail trading flows can come close to rivalling Wall Street's.
The technology itself can certainly be transformative, but it doesn't necessarily mean the future is decentralised. You mention Napster, but the music industry is arguably more centralised than ever - Napster changed the model, but now everything just goes through a handful of relatively new companies like Spotify and Apple instead.
Ah but both Spotify and Apple are infinitely more open than the record labels that went before them.
I agree it’s the biggest target so far, and the most entrenched, but people + technology topples dictatorships every time, even if those dictatorships learn to harness the new mode eventually.
Banks and countries have tried to create their own currencies to “own” the blockchain on crypto, but none work because it defeats the point of a decentralised ledger. I’ve seen the same thoughts in property about blockchaining the Land Registry (which is a research project LR are doing), but that’s based in an actual monopoly (U.K. Gov decides who owns what in the U.K.).
Seems to me stocks and shares are a lot more like currency: no real underlying monopoly other than capability to run the network. Decentralise the network and all that’s left is reputation. Which an incident like throttling retail buys to fiddle the market can destroy.
I’m betting 5-10 years from now we’ll see a serious challenge to the legacy stock markets and companies floating on some blockchain based market. It’ll be seen as a joke at first, but a decade later will be a serious player and those in on the ground floor will do very well.