Match Thread Coventry v Watford (7 Viewers)

nmp2327

Well-Known Member
Good point, would have taken that at the start. Biamou looked leggy and off the pace. Subs were an odd decision but at least it is one more point than I expected from this run of games.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Hardly, our striker is not effective at this level and we missed a couple of excellent headed chances.
HOpe the players can stay confident and take the positives out of that even if some of our fan base think we are now nailed on for relegation

The chances missed defy belief some of them
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
Daylight robbery Watford getting a point they didn’t turn up, let them off the hook big time.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
100%. Our fanbase is appalling sometimes.

We've just bossed one of the best teams in the division, it was basically a Premier League side vs a League One side & but for missing some very decent chances we'd have won the game.

T
Ohare man of the match
Another point towards safety we a a decent striker short of being a very good team

Gonna add Ostigard. To big 3.
The big 4! Hamer, James, Ohare. Osti.

Ohare motm. Followed by James.

You won't watch too many better 0-0s.

Held on well at the end. Marosi a big save. And thank the woodwork, about time someone else hit it!
 

the rumpo kid

Well-Known Member
Should have won, better than Watford but the sky commentators just go on about how poor Watford are instead of how well we managed the game , more luck required .

And who is this maroshi guy ?
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
If you can't see that the players put in a shift, tried to win against a good team, and that it's a decent point, you need to have a word with yourself, or a reality check. I was proud of that performance. James' positional play is excellent and Da Costa looks to be a big plus.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
Nope, agree. Only other option was Gyokeres for Biamou, but Hamer did look shot and O'Hare had ran himself into the ground.

Hamer was fantastic for 70 mins then just went to shit and could barely run, didn't look injured, just knackered.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
T

Gonna add Ostigard. To big 3.
The big 4! Hamer, James, Ohare. Osti.

Ohare motm. Followed by James.

You won't watch too many better 0-0s.

Held on well at the end. Marosi a big save. And thank the woodwork, about time someone else hit it!
No they missed their chances their chances defy belief
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Yea but a point can't be enough pre match and not enough post match... That's mental thinking 🤣

It isn't, this is part of the problem.

What is on paper and what happens on the pitch are two entirely different things.

Games are dynamic and this mentality that we should be start stuck to be where we are is a bit silly.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
On the 85th minute?

He took off O'hare and Hamer who were our two best players.

You make yourself look silly every week when you try and defend his baffling changes.

If you genuinely think that they were our best players then that's your opinion, albeit a baffling one. For me Østigård & James were miles better.

Hamer had one of his poorer games & looked absolutely shattered, wasn't surprised he went off. I'd have probably hooked Allen or Biamou rather than O'Hare but hey ho.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
On the 85th minute?

He took off O'hare and Hamer who were our two best players.

You make yourself look silly every week when you try and defend his baffling changes.

Don't know why he took O'Hare off but Hamer was fucked.
To be fair to Shipley he didn't put a foot wrong in our half though equally he didn't put a foot right in their half.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
It isn't, this is part of the problem.

What is on paper and what happens on the pitch are two entirely different things.

Games are dynamic and this mentality that we should be start stuck to be where we are is a bit silly.
In that case stop worrying about opposition teams. More often than not they turn out to be not very good!
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
If you genuinely think that they were our best players then that's your opinion, albeit a baffling one. For me Østigård & James were miles better.

Hamer had one of his poorer games & looked absolutely shattered, wasn't surprised he went off. I'd have probably hooked Allen or Biamou rather than O'Hare but hey ho.

If you would have made different changes than the manager, then why do you get so upset when other people also state that? Especially when most people are in a consensus that his changes come too late and are often strange.

Your approach is baffling.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top