Trying to diminish what I'm saying, when I have clearly explained my point seeks to make you look silly, not me. You are also making things deliberately worse by taking Walkers chance and gradually making it sound harder and harder. He wasn't forty yards out.
Biamou had decent chances. Everyone agrees. Biamou did actually put himself about a bit too.
Walker did fuck all for the entirety of the game, then had a pretty good chance at the end which he fucked up. Yet people, particularly you, don't want to acknowledge it.
I hope that he improves and gets better and better like Shmmeee has said, but I cannot help you if you can't read basic English, and if you have such weighted opinions on certain players, that's your prerogative.
Not trying to diminish at all, you haven't clearly explained, hence why almost everyone is replying with questions. Happy to admit I'm silly but no, I don't understand & don't think I'm alone in that.
Here's my points to what you've said there.
Walker's chance was incredibly difficult. You disagree but xG was invented for exactly the purpose of measuring chance difficulty & Walker's chance was rated as 0.06 xG i.e. Only scored 6% of the time, you're making it out to be far simpler than it was.
By comparison, all of Biamou's were easier.
Now, the point about Walker not being involved enough is much fairer. Playing the 2 as a pair though, they don't play identical roles. Your target man (Biamou) will always come deeper to get on the ball, win flick ons etc. whilst your other striker (Walker) will attempt to find space behind etc. If they're both doing the same job they'd be useless & also we wouldn't be playing to their strengths.
Walker's movement generally is very good, no he wasn't at his best last night, but we all know his lack of game time & you also have to give credit to Swansea who absolutely did a job on him, as they did with Biamou.
They have the best defensive record for a reason.