Matty James (6 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Good article

Is he a better bet for that role than kelly for next season. I adore Kelly so it’s a hard one and I bet robins loves him too

 

Barnsley

Well-Known Member
Circumstances around leaving Barnsley he doesn’t want to discuss? Intriguing 🤔

Any ideas @Barnsley?

looking at our tactics since January when we signed two strikers, we’ve changed all three front men between 45 minutes and 60 minutes, with Matty in the team we had to replace him around the 60 minute mark, because he wasn’t fit enough to play at our tempo for a full game, I think it was a case of he was costing too much not to play, and he was limiting our changes having to come off so we took the decision to let him leave.

but it’s guessing on my part.
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
Key -

“fresh start on the table at Coventry”

Notice robins has gone to the diamond after everyone having a meltdown over using it after slade.
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
A Kelly James Hamer midfield is strong but not very quick or penetrative. I suspect long term Kelly and James are vying for the same spot
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Money can be better spent elsewhere IMO , wouldn’t be disheartened if we signed him, but feel other areas need addressing

Pretty much my feelings. He’s been solid enough but not massively impressive. If we keep him ahead of Kelly, fine. If we don’t, fine.
 

Magwitch1

Well-Known Member
Money can be better spent elsewhere IMO , wouldn’t be disheartened if we signed him, but feel other areas need addressing
But different signing of similar quality could cost big bucks and high wages so why when we know what Matty James brings to the table and has fitted into the team well.
 

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
A lot is going to be dependent on the options MR gets to make. The more season tickets are sold the more SISU will release the purse strings, so much of what will happen on the transfer front is in our hands as fans.

edit - Just read this back and of course it is stating the obvious, but sometimes I think some of our fans lose sight of this simple reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vow

Magwitch1

Well-Known Member
A lot is going to be dependent on the options MR gets to make. The more season tickets are sold the more SISU will release the purse strings, so much of what will happen on the transfer front is in our hands as fans.

edit - Just read this back and of course it is stating the obvious, but sometimes I think some of our fans lose sight of this simple reality.
I wish I shared your confidence the more STs sold means the more sisu will release to MR for team building. The last three summers for example funds for the MRs budget have been on the back of large incoming transfer fees I’m not confident we will have that this season.
 

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
I wish I shared your confidence the more STs sold means the more sisu will release to MR for team building. The last three summers for example funds for the MRs budget have been on the back of large incoming transfer fees I’m not confident we will have that this season.
That's because we spend what we make. Can't spend huge fees if we have next to no income
 

Blind-Faith

Well-Known Member
But different signing of similar quality could cost big bucks and high wages so why when we know what Matty James brings to the table and has fitted into the team well.

I know it’s an absolute long shot, but I’d rather use the money from his wages and throw it all at getting Leo on a permanent deal.
 

cov donkey kick

Well-Known Member
Keeping James as well as Kelly (who should get 2 years) it leaves Sheaf in the cold so Robins on a small budget can't see him being retained and none of us know how set in stone this arrangement is also we are needing other areas of the pitch positions reinforced.
I can only see with that possible Conundrum Sheafs deal being abandoned as James will be a major part of any budget.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Keeping James as well as Kelly (who should get 2 years) it leaves Sheaf in the cold so Robins on a small budget can't see him being retained and none of us know how set in stone this arrangement is also we are needing other areas of the pitch positions reinforced.
I can only see with that possible Conundrum Sheafs deal being abandoned as James will be a major part of any budget.

We do know how set in stone it is. Robins has said it’s an obligation not an option.

Frankly if we lose out on a good young prospect to have two ageing crocks at DM I’d be worried about Robins’ judgement.
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
Did anyone else hear Boddy on Friday night say that clubs will be paying for this last season for years to come
Yes-wonder if that will make it a more level playing field in terms of transfers etc in the next couple of years?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Yes-wonder if that will make it a more level playing field in terms of transfers etc in the next couple of years?
Not while other clubs are happy to lose millions a year. Obviously more income will improve things but if we're attempting to be self sustaining and other clubs are happily losing a fortune its still going to be hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Not while other clubs are happy to lose millions a year. Obviously more income will improve things but if we're attempting to be self sustaining and other clubs are happily losing a fortune its still going to be hard.

Forest lost 32 million last year apparently. And have 3nd3d up just outside the relegation places. Mind boggling
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Forest lost 32 million last year apparently. And have 3nd3d up just outside the relegation places. Mind boggling
Yeah and kind of confirms the impression of the rot across certain perceived established giants in our league who just keep digging to escape their reality I think.
Just compound their situation year on year ,owner on owner etc

Hoping to be sort of proved right at seasons end that it would all contribute to our continuation ,not quite as effectively as I initially thought as they're all rolling the dice again be it personnel or financial switches.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
We do know how set in stone it is. Robins has said it’s an obligation not an option.

Frankly if we lose out on a good young prospect to have two ageing crocks at DM I’d be worried about Robins’ judgement.
Would totally go against our model aswell. I’d question Robins judgement aswell
 

Magwitch1

Well-Known Member
Forest lost 32 million last year apparently. And have 3nd3d up just outside the relegation places. Mind boggling
And one of the reasons Forest amongst others fail is they appoint cheque book managers. It’s okay flashing the cash about but you have to get them to perform.
Which Mark Robins has done here.
 

vow

Well-Known Member
We do know how set in stone it is. Robins has said it’s an obligation not an option.

Frankly if we lose out on a good young prospect to have two ageing crocks at DM I’d be worried about Robins’ judgement.
I've never seen an article/interview with MR saying this? That would be worrying to me due to the price being reported was £750k!?

I don't think Sheaf is worth anywhere near that and I'd prefer to have James in any case as I think he's a better all-round footballer and potential leader also.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I've never seen an article/interview with MR saying this? That would be worrying to me due to the price being reported was £750k!?

I don't think Sheaf is worth anywhere near that and I'd prefer to have James in any case as I think he's a better all-round footballer and potential leader also.


I think you're very very wrong on Sheaf, but that's besides the point. I think James is a Kelly replacement anyway, not a Sheaf replacement, but I'd still take Sheaf over him if he was due to his resale value.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top