Thank you and goodby (14 Viewers)

bringbackrattles

Well-Known Member
If we are dreadful tomorrow and then dreadful again against Bournemouth, I think an awful lot more people will be saying we are starting to look doomed.

On their day, QPR a very decent side. Still no excuse for ineptitude though

I will be expecting that Robins has bashed a few heads and we will be on the front foot tomorrow
Spot on Otis. Take a bow.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
A few silly Billy's on here!

Grendel betting that Godden will never score again this season! Dear oh dear!

no I haven’t?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
One day some may get their wish, but maybe not as they expected?

Lol as if that’s going to happen - the Bristol fans would prefer Pearson to be retained
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
Id bet you Godden will not score in all the the remaining games - make your price

Context is always important grendel. But you can keep making cheap shots if you like!
Quote: "If he scores in just a couple that would suggest we are in with a winning chance"
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Er you put that as a statement within the paragraph?
I'm missing somethig too. It appears decent voices are about on this board, he asks who would bet against Godden scoring, while he implies he thinks Godden will. You pipe up and say me, I'd bet against Godden scoring.

What more context is there?!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vow

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I'm missing somethig too. It appears decent voices are about on this board, he asks who would bet against Godden scoring, while he implies he thinks Godden will. You pipe up and say me, I'd bet against Godden scoring.

What more context is there?!?

Being kind to G he probably meant Godden wouldn’t score in every individual game, versus not scoring in any of the remaining games. Unless I’m being daft which is a possibility
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Being kind to G he probably meant Godden wouldn’t score in every individual game, versus not scoring in any of the remaining games. Unless I’m being daft which is a possibility
That's what I thought he meant!

I'm missing completely what context there is missing! Paxman thinks he will, Grendel thinks he won't. End of, as the youth of 15 years ago would say.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
That's what I thought he meant!

I'm missing completely what context there is missing! Paxman thinks he will, Grendel thinks he won't. End of, as the youth of 15 years ago would say.

Yes Paxman said who’d bet against him scoring in every game - I said I’d take the bet and Paxman decided to rewrite history
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sorry matey you are over my head with that one?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top