Ben Sheaf future (15 Viewers)

Frostie

Well-Known Member
At the risk of sounding stupid, had we already budgeted for Sheaf out of this seasons kitty or will it come out of next seasons? I only ask as it was already agreed this season

No way of knowing the financial aspects of the deal unfortunately unless something is leaked out but I believe the structure of the deal was at least partly so we hadn't used up all our budget for the season.

On a related note, a lot of people are getting hung up on the reported fee of £750k but it's worth remembering this was only being quoted at the very start when Nixon first stated our interest & that was when he believed it would be an immediate, permanent transfer.
By doing the loan deal as we did it's possible the subsequent fee has reduced (less time on contract, we've been paying his salary for a year etc.) plus I wouldn't be at all surprised if we'd paid a small fee to secure the loan anyway.

I still really struggle to see the downside of this deal. He's already a good player (yes, he makes mistakes), he has huge scope for improvement & it's, at worst, a modest fee with a probable return on investment.

Look at some of the players being released by our competitors this last week or so that they've literally wasted millions on;
Diedhiou £5.3m to Bristol City - released on a free
Baldock/Aluko approx. £11m for both to be absolutely awful at Reading & then released for nothing.
Flick through some of the released lists, the return on investment by & large is horrendous.

We're not going to get it right every time (especially shopping at Aldi whilst most are at Waitrose) but generally we're doing the right things - trust the process.
 

procdoc

Well-Known Member
No way of knowing the financial aspects of the deal unfortunately unless something is leaked out but I believe the structure of the deal was at least partly so we hadn't used up all our budget for the season.

On a related note, a lot of people are getting hung up on the reported fee of £750k but it's worth remembering this was only being quoted at the very start when Nixon first stated our interest & that was when he believed it would be an immediate, permanent transfer.
By doing the loan deal as we did it's possible the subsequent fee has reduced (less time on contract, we've been paying his salary for a year etc.) plus I wouldn't be at all surprised if we'd paid a small fee to secure the loan anyway.

I still really struggle to see the downside of this deal. He's already a good player (yes, he makes mistakes), he has huge scope for improvement & it's, at worst, a modest fee with a probable return on investment.

Look at some of the players being released by our competitors this last week or so that they've literally wasted millions on;
Diedhiou £5.3m to Bristol City - released on a free
Baldock/Aluko approx. £11m for both to be absolutely awful at Reading & then released for nothing.
Flick through some of the released lists, the return on investment by & large is horrendous.

We're not going to get it right every time (especially shopping at Aldi whilst most are at Waitrose) but generally we're doing the right things - trust the process.
Excellently put. At least the flops like Kasta didn’t cost us millions in transfer fees
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
Wasn’t a massive sheaf fan in the end but if he’s signed I’m behind him

For the first 7 mins of the next game I see him at then it’s back to business as usual 😎
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
No way of knowing the financial aspects of the deal unfortunately unless something is leaked out but I believe the structure of the deal was at least partly so we hadn't used up all our budget for the season.

On a related note, a lot of people are getting hung up on the reported fee of £750k but it's worth remembering this was only being quoted at the very start when Nixon first stated our interest & that was when he believed it would be an immediate, permanent transfer.
By doing the loan deal as we did it's possible the subsequent fee has reduced (less time on contract, we've been paying his salary for a year etc.) plus I wouldn't be at all surprised if we'd paid a small fee to secure the loan anyway.

I still really struggle to see the downside of this deal. He's already a good player (yes, he makes mistakes), he has huge scope for improvement & it's, at worst, a modest fee with a probable return on investment.

Look at some of the players being released by our competitors this last week or so that they've literally wasted millions on;
Diedhiou £5.3m to Bristol City - released on a free
Baldock/Aluko approx. £11m for both to be absolutely awful at Reading & then released for nothing.
Flick through some of the released lists, the return on investment by & large is horrendous.

We're not going to get it right every time (especially shopping at Aldi whilst most are at Waitrose) but generally we're doing the right things - trust the process.
Excellent post.

I think Sheaf will be a good player for us in time.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Nii Lampety podcast getting in on the Sheaf hate now. “If James is a car Sheaf is a unicycle” and “MR should tell Sheaf what Jarni did was a good thing”.

Last time I listened one of them lost their shit about some very mild criticism of Bakayoko so it’s a bit rich.

Get em cancelled.
 

CDK

Well-Known Member
So he's permanent,plenty of promise and young to boot so in robins I trust as he's the guy thats there to be shot at.
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
Nii Lampety podcast getting in on the Sheaf hate now. “If James is a car Sheaf is a unicycle” and “MR should tell Sheaf what Jarni did was a good thing”.

Last time I listened one of them lost their shit about some very mild criticism of Bakayoko so it’s a bit rich.

Get em cancelled.
Their end of season pod had some very odd views on it. Lots of shout for Hyam as one of the PotS and a lot of Fadz criticism.
 

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Can't be true, I read on here Robins was getting us out of the deal??!

I honestly hope we can get out of this deal but doubt we will if what Nixon says is true which would make sense. Sheaf unfortunately just isn’t near our starting 11 so to spend $750k on someone to sit on the bench all season is wasteful when that’s the price we’d pay for a starting 11 player


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
I honestly hope we can get out of this deal but doubt we will if what Nixon says is true which would make sense. Sheaf unfortunately just isn’t near our starting 11 so to spend $750k on someone to sit on the bench all season is wasteful when that’s the price we’d pay for a starting 11 player


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I understand your point but it’s just the ups and downs of transfers. If Hamer moves on for £5m + we will have invested very wisely in him, but maybe less wisely in Sheaf ( hopefully he will be much better next season ) .

We have been fishing in a pond of gambles. Players that other clubs don’t want, unknown foreign players, or young players with potential.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I honestly hope we can get out of this deal but doubt we will if what Nixon says is true which would make sense. Sheaf unfortunately just isn’t near our starting 11 so to spend $750k on someone to sit on the bench all season is wasteful when that’s the price we’d pay for a starting 11 player


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hes literally played in almost every game he’s been fit you loon. “Not in our starting eleven” 😂😂
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top