Id Expect an organisation who runs the club to not rely on asset sales to minimise escalating losses and also not to have adopted a strategy of revenue deterioration by removing the club from its home
Sisu have had 14 years at the club. Good or bad in your view?
In any other business yes, it would be crazy, but most football clubs run at significant losses.
You seem to think the St Andrews move was a deliberate ploy & purely down to them which, as you criticised another poster for, is conjecture.
They've since negotiated a better deal than we've ever had previously at the Ricoh so... Ends justify the means? We'll see.
The Sisu tenure has been majority bad, of course, I'm not sure many would argue otherwise.
They've definitely turned a corner more recently with Seppala being more hands on & also Boddy's appointment (despite well founded skepticism) has worked well. Robins now has significant control over the majority of the footballing side - these are all things they should have done sooner rather than the failed Ranson experiment. If they'd had a similar model but coupled it with the support afforded to Ranson & greatly inferior managers we likely would have been much more successful. That's all in the past though, we are where we are now & have to work under these constraints.
So what do you expect in the here & now?