Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
They said that but he didn’t get on the the bench once, even the Millwall and Huddersfield games
Was he not named the very first game after he signed?
They said that but he didn’t get on the the bench once, even the Millwall and Huddersfield games
Was he not named the very first game after he signed?
Which again makes it odd why you wouldn't just let him go back on loan, no?They said that but he didn’t get on the the bench once, even the Millwall and Huddersfield games
Which sea lies between England and Scotland?
Anglesey
Which again makes it odd why you wouldn't just let him go back on loan, no?
As said, he did have an injury as soon as he rocked up, so you could maybe forgive the lack of substitue appearances last season. This season, however... he *surely* has to either be backup, or go elsewhere for a while.
In which case, why would they be happy to send him out on loan last season, until they decided he was good enough to be backup?Not if the club wants or feels they need to develop him a bit with us before he goes out on loan.
Wrong, Anglesey is in northwestern Wales.
Yes publicly near the end of last season but I don't believe he's changed his opinion in the meantimeWasn’t that last season or a more recent interview?
Christ, I don't know what the fuck has happened to some of our fans. Scraping the barrel for a whinge about fans discussing the players at the club.Maybe things changed between last season and this season?
Christ, I don't know what the fuck has happened to some of our fans. Scraping the barrel for a whinge about something.
Which again makes it odd why you wouldn't just let him go back on loan, no?
As said, he did have an injury as soon as he rocked up, so you could maybe forgive the lack of substitue appearances last season. This season, however... he *surely* has to either be backup, or go elsewhere for a while.
They may have thought that we were too short of cover at LWB to let him go on loan, even with Maatsen on board we are a bit light there.Which again makes it odd why you wouldn't just let him go back on loan, no?
As said, he did have an injury as soon as he rocked up, so you could maybe forgive the lack of substitue appearances last season. This season, however... he *surely* has to either be backup, or go elsewhere for a while.
Indeed. Which is kind of my point, if we get cover in, it's pretty pointless him hanging around, really. No real whinging there, just pointing out that he can't be not cover, and us not sign anybody.They may have thought that we were too short of cover at LWB to let him go on loan, even with Maatsen on board we are a bit light there.
With Salter on board, and possibly another defender on loan we may see him loaned before the end of the month.
Bright got a round of applause just for showing up for training
the sound damaged his eardrums according to self diagnosis - 6 weeks on the sidelines
A convenient excuse too.the sound damaged his eardrums according to self diagnosis - 6 weeks on the sidelines
Pardon??A convenient excuse too.
MR: Team meeting at 9am tomorrow Bright.
Bright: What?
MR: Team meeting. Tomorrow. 9am.
Bright: WHAT?!
Agree but our ratio is not great. Of those signed who fit that criteria not many have made an impact in the last 24 months? Happy to be corrected by a list of those that have.Being signed at 19 would suggest we might have to give him time to settle and develop.
Like most of our signings, they are young players with potential to be developed rather than the finished article.
Some will come off some wont.
Agree but our ratio is not great. Of those signed who fit that criteria not many have made an impact in the last 36 months? Happy to hear your list of those that have.
Which sea lies between England and Scotland?