Wasps downward spiral... (46 Viewers)

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Might be worth putting their fans in the away end the next time there's a local derby.
 

jordan210

Well-Known Member
In comparison to the rest of the league. Have the likes of Sale and Saracens not played as many games at home?

I would guess most have played the same. Just shows how weak rugby is in drawing crowds.


Looking at historic figures Leicester have always been high on attendance
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Surely that crowd is smaller than the 5500 we had against Northampton in the Carabao?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
In comparison to the rest of the league. Have the likes of Sale and Saracens not played as many games at home?

Before yesterday I think Saracans only played 2 and they have a capacity of only 10,000
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
I would guess most have played the same. Just shows how weak rugby is in drawing crowds.


Looking at historic figures Leicester have always been high on attendance
Leicester and Bristol get big crowds because of the size of their Cities, Newcastle is a football City, with the exception of Bath who get great support the other teams are smaller Towns/Cities like Worcester, Gloucester and Exeter, then you've got an abundance of London Based teams, let's face it Rugby Union doesn't have the interest like football does in this country!
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
They havnt got a 32000 arena to look after, I'm sure their owners and local businesses help with sponsorship and wages are nothing like premiership rugby players.

My nephew played for Stockport he was part time there and must have been one of the higher earners at a little over 26k per year, they were a league below the conference.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
From the Wasps forum, in response to 'what was the crowd. Gents?'

Low

Agreed. It felt like 8-9,000.

Some of the photos I've seen it doesn't even look that.



From the photos on here it looks 5k tops
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
In comparison to the rest of the league. Have the likes of Sale and Saracens not played as many games at home?
If the attendances they are getting are good why on earth did they move to a 32K stadium? It can't be great for the players, and therefore for recruitment, to be playing in a less than quarter full stadium.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If the attendances they are getting are good why on earth did they move to a 32K stadium? It can't be great for the players, and therefore for recruitment, to be playing in a less than quarter full stadium.

Clearly to get a stadium on a long lease which makes significant revenue elsewhere - Richardson has more interest in that
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

jordan210

Well-Known Member
From the Wasps forum, in response to 'what was the crowd. Gents?'

Low

Agreed. It felt like 8-9,000.

Some of the photos I've seen it doesn't even look that.



From the photos on here it looks 5k tops


Surprised they are no quoting 15k plus. Im sure its all soemone else fault. Bonfire weekend,Sunday. Not exact temperate for their fans to come out. No enough craft ale at the stadium. Some sort of excuse.
 

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
Work with 2 Wasps fans down here in Kent. They went in a carload recently and got free tickets as their partner works for NHS!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Surprised they are no quoting 15k plus. Im sure its all soemone else fault. Bonfire weekend,Sunday. Not exact temperate for their fans to come out. No enough craft ale at the stadium. Some sort of excuse.

That’s indeed what they’re saying
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Think wasps are about 7th or 8th in the average attendances

That's shocking in terms of the stadium/facilities they are playing in, yet totally understandable in that there is no generational fanbase in the area. There is no way that there was a plus 8k crowd there based on those photos (unless several thousand had stayed in the bars)
 

Warthog

Well-Known Member
We actually have a really exciting young team atm. Results aren’t there but performances are. Tom Willis is a real talent
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
L
We actually have a really exciting young team atm. Results aren’t there but performances are. Tom Willis is a real talent

Ha. You've got a young team, not out of choice, but because the bond's been spunked on 'marquee' players who didn't want to stick around. So much for richest team in Europe, eh.

Also, I'm not sure that the performances can be there if the results aren't, but then I've seen elsewhere that you work to your own logic.

Are you actually a city fan, just out of interest, or are you just here on a wind up?
 

Warthog

Well-Known Member
L

Ha. You've got a young team, not out of choice, but because the bond's been spunked on 'marquee' players who didn't want to stick around. So much for richest team in Europe, eh.

Also, I'm not sure that the performances can be there if the results aren't, but then I've seen elsewhere that you work to your own logic.

Are you actually a city fan, just out of interest, or are you just here on a wind up?

You clearly don’t know much about rugby so we’ll leave it there
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
What’s happened to Earlsdon after his embarrassing behaviour on this thread? Taking time out?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
You clearly don’t know much about rugby so we’ll leave it there

You'll leave it there because you haven't got any actual response.

Stick to fireworks and flags and leave the rugby to people who actually like and understand the game.

You've never yet backed up one of your posts with anything factual or even vaguely interesting. You were making stuff up on the other thread where you bottled it when challenged, and you're making stuff up here as well.

Begone foul wum, we've got your number now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top