Their Red Card (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Lee Bowyer will be appealing Woods' red card: The #BCFC boss said “Woods was in control and he was just making a foul so we'll be appealing for sure because we'll be showing them a load of fouls that's happened to our players, so hopefully we'll get that one turned around
Just making a foul Bowyer is mad I hope they appeal and fail and he gets extra.
Just making a foul Bowyer is mad I hope they appeal and fail and he gets extra.
North York’s Blue
Well-Known Member
No intention of playing the ball, right across the back of his legs, could have led to a serious injury. It wasn’t just a ‘take one for the team’ trip. Ref got it spot on.
andrew.roberts
Well-Known Member
It was a very cynical challenge and the fact that he wasn't scythed down in the way their player intended and was caught with his other foot is by the by.
The intent was there and had he caught him with his leading foot it could have caused a serious injury.
Enviado desde mi SM-A202F mediante Tapatalk
The intent was there and had he caught him with his leading foot it could have caused a serious injury.
Enviado desde mi SM-A202F mediante Tapatalk
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Just watched it back and the way he snuggly walked away thinking he was getting a yellow and then the shock of the red. It was the kind of foul that dirty Bowyer used to get away with.
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
While Bowyer is there they should say no change red card and while you are here let’s have a look at this shirt pull and ban him as well, it’s just the same as a dive in the box for me.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Boywer is a rat faced little fuck.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
They should of been down to about -7 players
Otis
Well-Known Member
-7? All the team plus the subs?
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
His team play exactly how you'd expect don't they.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
-7? All the team plus the subs?
Yeah, prehistoric football
Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
I was surprised it was a red card but can see why it was given. Nasty, cynical foul.
I did wonder if the ref remembered Woods clearly telling him to “fuck off” earlier on, after his tackle on Hamer was deemed a foul. The ref had a word with him then…maybe felt afterwards he should’ve booked him?
Anyway, one of the highlights of the match, seeing his amazement and subsequent anger.
I did wonder if the ref remembered Woods clearly telling him to “fuck off” earlier on, after his tackle on Hamer was deemed a foul. The ref had a word with him then…maybe felt afterwards he should’ve booked him?
Anyway, one of the highlights of the match, seeing his amazement and subsequent anger.
Skybluefaz
Well-Known Member
The challenge could have done serious injury if Maatsens leg was planted that's why it was a red.
robbiethemole
Well-Known Member
but can you imagine having to pay good money to watch that awful fucking shit footy every week??
even at our lowest point, never did we resort to that crap, hoof it up to Deeney and try and win a free kick or a throw.
and how fucking boring is using a long throw every time, when it never looked like being a good option.
so glad we play good attacking footy, and how quick were our counter attacks, like lightning with 4/5 men going all together.
long live King Robins, PUSB
even at our lowest point, never did we resort to that crap, hoof it up to Deeney and try and win a free kick or a throw.
and how fucking boring is using a long throw every time, when it never looked like being a good option.
so glad we play good attacking footy, and how quick were our counter attacks, like lightning with 4/5 men going all together.
long live King Robins, PUSB
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
What a cuntt, if his leg was planted that's potentially a leg breaker from behind. Deserves more than 3 match ban even before the appeal, plus the smirking from the little cuntt.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Definitely the sort of prick that mouths off on a night out then hides behind his mates. Sunday league, he's getting battered after that challenge.
Yorkshire SB
Well-Known Member
Yeah you can't just do any foul, if not studs up or not last man and expect to not get a red card. He was asking for it.
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Bowyer said he wasn’t even the last man, so what it was a foul from behind (you can’t say tackle really) it should be a three match ban and one more for the ridiculous appeal.
Nick
Administrator
He even looks like Kevin Thornton too.
Winny the Bish
Well-Known Member
It only ended up being a trip because he just missed planting his studs into Maatsen's leg. That was his intention. Definite red.
⁸
Also:
He can’t get three games for that, come on. Alright he has fouled the fella but he has just tripped him. That’s all he has done, he has not put his studs down his calf or anything like that. He has just clipped his legs.
Ermmmmm!
Also:
He can’t get three games for that, come on. Alright he has fouled the fella but he has just tripped him. That’s all he has done, he has not put his studs down his calf or anything like that. He has just clipped his legs.
Ermmmmm!
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
You are absolutely right.
I said it on the match thread at the time. He shouted ´fuck off´ right in the face of the ref and got away with it.
When he did the challenge and started laughing, I was actually swearing at the tv. I was on my own and never do that, but it made me so angry I actually wanted to punch him. Absolutely horrible little c**t. Hopefully the ban will get extended.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Yep, as most have said it's endangering an opponent which can only be a red card.
SERIOUS FOUL PLAY
A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.
I think Blues fans & the player himself thought he would get away with it because he avoided the denial of a goal scoring opportunity scenario & he would have just seen yellow if he simply pulled him/tripped him etc. but you can't suddenly start lunging into high tackles from behind, serious risk of injuring Maatsen there = correct decision.
SERIOUS FOUL PLAY
A tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality must be sanctioned as serious foul play.
Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force or endangers the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.
I think Blues fans & the player himself thought he would get away with it because he avoided the denial of a goal scoring opportunity scenario & he would have just seen yellow if he simply pulled him/tripped him etc. but you can't suddenly start lunging into high tackles from behind, serious risk of injuring Maatsen there = correct decision.
jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
Yep. I was also watching on my own (shit innit) and called him a narky little c**t both to my telly & on the match thread.
Proper cowardly shitbag challenge....as someone else said, do that in Sunday League & you're getting a fist through the face.....
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Bowyer also thought they were the better side so...
Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
Case solved.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
You sound about 5 years old
SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
Seem to remember Bowyer when a youngster starting his career got done for smashing up a McDonalds I think it was and when at Leeds having to go to court re some sort of racial incident, I think he got off that, as some one said earlier I little runt with a rat face.
As a fitting claim to fame he was the first premier player to reach 100 yellow cards.
As a fitting claim to fame he was the first premier player to reach 100 yellow cards.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
The GBH was in a nightclub
We thought we’d signed him at one point before Leeds stepped in
Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue
Well-Known Member
I thought the red was right as the potential and intention to put his foot down the back of Maatsen’s planted foot was there. It’s high and from behind, which anyone that’s played knows can be dangerous when you can’t see it coming.
From memory, Bowyer was a good player in his time at Leeds and a battler but committed some horrible fouls. Remember him stamping on a Valencia player’s head in the Champions League, which is as bad as it gets.