Most fans have been brought up playing and/or watching football where flagging somebody offside was a spontaneous decision made by somebody using the naked eye only.
How can so many fans not know the basic premise of it? Fair enough the interfering, the second phase etc it's complicated.
Not the simple basics of it.
Most fans have been brought up playing and/or watching football where flagging somebody offside was a spontaneous decision made by somebody using the naked eye only.
In that circumstance you could see the decision easily going either way and on the basis of the general "benefit of the doubt" to an attacker Kane would likely be judged onside.
Haha, bloody hell I hadn't even noticed the keeper was off his lineNo it's people thinking he was onside because of Rugider being by the 6 yard box rather than the one he was more in line with.
Haha, bloody hell I hadn't even noticed the keeper was off his line
WTF is the keeper doing? Said it before but the maths just doesn't stack up for making decisions this tight using VAR. Once you factor in the frame rate and speed the ball & players are moving at there's a significant margin of error. Needs something similar to umpires call in cricket.
I have also had a discussion with someone who thought he was played onside by Rudiger. Didn’t realise that it was 2 defensive players to be onside.
It’s because usually one of the two is the keeperYeah that's what I was getting at.
Madness the amount of people who didn't realise.
so Question
You can only be offside with a part of the body that you can legally score with (cant be offside with your hand)
Can an opponents hand play you onside?
I genuinely dont know the answer
How can so many fans not know the basic premise of it? Fair enough the interfering, the second phase etc it's complicated.
Not the simple basics of it.