What happened in the dugout? (7 Viewers)

[Nick]

After we scored, just saw it all kicking off.

 

---

[clint van damme]

Hopefully Viveash knocked fuck out of a couple of them

 

[Jamesimus]

After we scored, just saw it all kicking off.

It appeared as though Lowe was unhappy about the goal and I imagine Adi gave him a few home truths about the way his team played.

 

[PVA]

Lowe started walking towards our bench and him and Vivash got very heated and had to be separated

 

[cc84cov]

Knew we needed to keep Kastaneer for times like that

 

[chiefdave]

Someone, possibly Lowe, came over to our dugout and started having a go. Not sure if it was directed as Viveash but he was closest and didn't take kindly to whatever was said.

Not sure I'd wander over to Viveash and have a pop to be honest, seems asking for trouble!

 

[CV22SBA]

Pretty sure it involved O’hare too. Lowe was trying to get at him

 

[Nick]

Pretty sure it involved O’hare too. Lowe was trying to get at him

Why?

 

[CDK]

Approached VIveash he must have a death wish.

 

[Tile Hill Phil]

Why?

What to give him another kick like his players had been doing

 

[higgs]

Gotta love adi hard as fuck

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Nick]

Did robins say what happened? I was too busy screaming like a little girl at tavares.

 

[Razzle Dazzle Dean Gordon]

The dirty scummers probably didn't like the way O'Hare kept getting in the way of their kicks. Hopefully Viveash gave a few of them a bit back, bunch of fouling pricks.

 

[lordy_87]

Hopefully the lads told Preston what they are in the tunnel after and got a sly couple of digs in

 

[Mild-Mannered Janitor]

Get Adi on the pitch and see the protection O’Hare gets then

 

[cc84cov]

Get Adi on the pitch and see the protection O’Hare gets then

Players like O’Hare get that treatment you stop them anyway you can that’s football

 

[stupot07]

Pretty sure it involved O’hare too. Lowe was trying to get at him

O'Hare was definitely in the thick of it.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

O'Hare was definitely in the thick of it.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

Well the protection he got today was an omnishambles

 

[skybluegod]

Players like O’Hare get that treatment you stop them anyway you can that’s football

No it's not football. It's quite literally against the rules. It's gamesmanship plain and simple.

 

[cc84cov]

No it's not football. It's quite literally against the rules. It's gamesmanship plain and simple.

Would you agree if we stopped flair players the same ? Or is that ok ?

 

[the rumpo kid]

Poor Callum O'Hare , that kid was kicked from pillar to post today, got up every time , took it on the chin like a real pro , no waving his arms around trying to get players booked. Absolute real player , real man, no diving no cheating just to good for the northern cunts . Pity a few more of our lads didn't join I and protect him!

 

[shepardo01]

Robins mentioned it in his interview - sly dig at their manager - saying that it's almost as if people aren't allowed to score against them and he took exception to a normal celebration of a goal.

 

[skybluegod]

Would you agree if we stopped flair players the same ? Or is that ok ?

No it's not okay. Its a ridiculous way to stop players. I would hate for us to act like that and my posting history will back that up.

 

[shmmeee]

Rotating fouls on a player is exploiting a loophole in the rules. It should be banned. I’d be sending the medical bills to the ref and Preston.

 

[cc84cov]

No it's not okay. Its a ridiculous way to stop players. I would hate for us to act like that and my posting history will back that up.

Agreed but it’s part of the game weather we like it or not we need strong ref’s

 

[Otis]

What happened in the dugout, stays in the dugout

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Their manager has moaned that they put up six minutes and then played 8 minutes, if he needs a bit of help with the tough bits it’s a minimum not a maximum.

 

[chiefdave]

Rotating fouls on a player is exploiting a loophole in the rules. It should be banned. I’d be sending the medical bills to the ref and Preston.

Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Evans pissing about refusing to leave the field on the nearest side and then behaving like a knob head in the corner

 

[shmmeee]

Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.

Id like to see the concept of team warnings for an offence brought in. Ref tells the captain the next time wasting/intentional foul on a targeted player will be a red whoever does it.

 

[Adge]

Its like we all know players get a yellow for cumulative fouls but that isn't in the rules. Why not just apply the same logic. If you reach the threshold just book the next player who makes a foul.

Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.


Cautionable offences
A player is cautioned if guilty of:
• delaying the restart of play
• dissent by word or action
• entering, re-entering or deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission
• failing to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a dropped ball, corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• persistent offences (no specific number or pattern of offences constitutes 'persistent')
• unsporting behaviour
• entering the referee review area (RRA)
• excessively using the ‘review’ (TV screen) signal

 

[shmmeee]

Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.


Cautionable offences
A player is cautioned if guilty of:
• delaying the restart of play
• dissent by word or action
• entering, re-entering or deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission
• failing to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a dropped ball, corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• persistent offences (no specific number or pattern of offences constitutes 'persistent')
• unsporting behaviour
• entering the referee review area (RRA)
• excessively using the ‘review’ (TV screen) signal

Whats that last one about?

 

[chiefdave]

Like most fans who don’t know the laws of the game, you have made yourself look a bit silly there with that statement.


Cautionable offences
A player is cautioned if guilty of:
• delaying the restart of play
• dissent by word or action
• entering, re-entering or deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission
• failing to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a dropped ball, corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• persistent offences (no specific number or pattern of offences constitutes 'persistent')
• unsporting behaviour
• entering the referee review area (RRA)
• excessively using the ‘review’ (TV screen) signal

Intersting, so why doesn't that get applied properly? Seems a different threshold is being applied to 1st and 2nd yellows.

Someone needs to tell that idiot that BT have on who agrees with whatever decision the refs make as that's where I picked that gem up from.

 

[Adge]

Whats that last one about?

Basically telling the referee to view the tv monitor repeatedly (making the tv sign). Really just another form of dissent regarding VAR.

 

[baldy]

View attachment 23978

What a country it is.

Was Ryan Lowe involved in this too? What’s this got to do with the thread?