Without actual net investment (2 Viewers)

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
The biggest worry for me is too many of the squad lack an end product. We play this wing back system, but the players we have aren´t really good enough for it in my opinion. Dabo must be making a good argument to head onto the transfer list, I think he has 7 assists and no goals in three seasons. Maatsen for me has some good moments but isn´t currently really good enough. Kane has fallen off the planet, and Bidwell has had a very slow start to put it politely.

The midfield also lack goals, with Sheaf not looking likely to score for the rest of his career, Allen goal shy, O´Hare having a shooting problem, so whilst we have a couple of decent strikers, we have a lot of chances, or possession of the ball in dangerous areas should I say, but an extremely low conversion rate. Here are the stats from last night:

1647508120990.png

You could copy and paste that from about 80% of our games this season. 12 corners, never going to score. 17 shots and 63% possession yet still lose 2-0. It makes for such an incredibly frustrating watch, which is a shame because you look at the Sheffield United game and almost get half excited for five minutes following that.

We need some investment in the squad, but I am not sure it is going to come.
 

Travs

Well-Known Member
What defines us. Sheff Utd or Hull?

Most likely we're somewhere in the middle.

A team on their day who can roll with the best in the division, but frustratingly inconsistent, which means we'll not grind out enough results to make it.

That's pretty much exactly where we are right now.

Pre-season many people (myself included) thought we'd be similar or worse than last year. But we've improved year on year, and there's nothing to suggest we are going to regress next season.

Becoming serious playoff contenders won't happen overnight, it'll be the biggest jump of the last decade. I expect at some point in the next 2 or 3 seasons we will probably regress to some degree, but talk of relegation battles seems a bit "meltdown" to me.
 

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
I think we need to be mindful of what has happened to Barnsley this season, in comparison to last year. We've so far managed to climb out of L2 & L1 with some large turnover of players. Such large changes are risky and we've benefited this season from some stability within the squad. Thus allowing for the built culture and ethos within the squad to be maintained.
Hence, I hope it's only a maximum of 10% change.
If we lose a couple of key players and make poor selections with a couple of the replacements, then we could slip back towards the lower half of the table again.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Granted external investment is desperately needed but it's worth mentioning that at one point last summer we had Jones, Pask, Bright, Dacosta, Hilssner, Mason, Kastaneer, Jobello, Drysdale on the books, all of which were never really going to make any kind of meaningful contribution on the pitch.

So, that was always going to massively impact the club's ability to do further business and subsequently leave us short in numbers going into the season.

With Kelly, Shipley and Walker all likely to be moved on in the summer as well I'd argue that Robins will have far more room to manoeuvre (if he's successful in moving on members of the bomb squad that are still under contract of course) than he did last summer. Granted Bidwell has probably taken up pretty much all of Walker's wages and more but the point still stands.

Regardless, I think until we see what the club is able to do in the next window, it's a bit ridiculous to claim one player departure will automatically plunge us into a relegation battle next season.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
I think we need to be mindful of what has happened to Barnsley this season, in comparison to last year. We've so far managed to climb out of L2 & L1 with some large turnover of players. Such large changes are risky and we've benefited this season from some stability within the squad. Thus allowing for the built culture and ethos within the squad to be maintained.
Hence, I hope it's only a maximum of 10% change.
If we lose a couple of key players and make poor selections with a couple of the replacements, then we could slip back towards the lower half of the table again.

In the space of a summer Barnsley lost their manager, their best player on a free as well their CEO who was instrumental to the entire operation.

It's not the same.
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
He’s done an admirable job in the circumstances but not sure where he’ll be moving to? Premier League clubs won’t consider him, I thought Sheffield United may come in for him but they’re doing well now.

good question. Maybe top end Championship with a bit of money to play with. Not stupid money just more than here 😀
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
What defines us. Sheff Utd or Hull?

Most likely we're somewhere in the middle.

A team on their day who can roll with the best in the division, but frustratingly inconsistent, which means we'll not grind out enough results to make it.

That's pretty much exactly where we are right now.

Pre-season many people (myself included) thought we'd be similar or worse than last year. But we've improved year on year, and there's nothing to suggest we are going to regress next season.

Becoming serious playoff contenders won't happen overnight, it'll be the biggest jump of the last decade. I expect at some point in the next 2 or 3 seasons we will probably regress to some degree, but talk of relegation battles seems a bit "meltdown" to me.
This is outrageous. You're not allowed to be reasonable and balanced mate. Either we get promoted this season or we go down next season. If we miss out total decline next season is inevitable.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Regardless, I think until we see what the club is able to do in the next window, it's a bit ridiculous to claim one player departure will automatically plunge us into a relegation battle next season.

No, it is not saying that. It's saying that it will already be a struggle as the last 20 games or so (over half the season) have shown that could be further exacerbated by players leaving or even not leaving, as it seems that squad improvement is pretty much predicated on it happening.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
As has been pointed out, the model under the current regime does not work at this level, we need a change of ownership before our luck runs out and we end up back in L1.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
No, it is not saying that. It's saying that it will already be a struggle as the last 20 games or so (over half the season) have shown that could be further exacerbated by players leaving or even not leaving, as it seems that squad improvement is pretty much predicated on it happening.

Hasn't squad improvement at the very least been partially based on moving contracted players on season after season though?

Why will it pose more of an issue this summer than it did in previous windows when pretty much the entirety of the bomb squad bar Kelly only has one year or less left remaining on their contracts - making it far easier to move them on?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Hasn't squad improvement at the very least been partially based on moving contracted players on season after season though?

Why will it pose more of an issue this summer than it did in previous windows when pretty much the entirety of the bomb squad bar Kelly only has one year or less left remaining on their contracts - making it far easier to move them on?

its more of an issue as we previously were selling players at very high fees for the league we were in

So Maddison, McCallum, McNulty, Stevenson, Bayliss, Harries and Thomas were signed by clubs one or two divisions above where we were.

You can obviously then recruit players for your league with the funds available much easier

Now if say we sell a player for £5 million even if the club permit £3 million to spend by definition it’s much much harder

our wage bill also has already gone up by over 300% in the last 4 years. We don’t have any funding available other than external investor high interest loans.

Any player recruited into the club will demand higher wages as we are a championship club

Without additional actual invested funds - not loans - it’s a whim and a prayer approach to success - not a co-ordinated one
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
its more of an issue as we previously were selling players at very high fees for the league we were in

So Maddison, McCallum, McNulty, Stevenson, Bayliss, Harries and Thomas were signed by clubs one or two divisions above where we were.

You can obviously then recruit players for your league with the funds available much easier

Now if say we sell a player for £5 million even if the club permit £3 million to spend by definition it’s much much harder

our wage bill also has already gone up by over 300% in the last 4 years. We don’t have any funding available other than external investor high interest loans.

Any player recruited into the club will demand higher wages as we are a championship club

Without additional actual invested funds - not loans - it’s a whim and a prayer approach to success - not a co-ordinated one

Yeah I get the issue over the medium term.

But I'm more questioning why one player sale translates into a relegation battle next season when realistically it probably won't, or rather there's no way of knowing that.

Undoubtedly it's likely over the next 3-5 years we are going to struggle to remain a Championship outfit under the current operation, as continuously selling first team players in order to finance the pay back of loans and debt is quite obviously completely unsustainable.
 
Last edited:

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
If he’s second only to Mitrovic then he’s likely to be getting some serious interest over the summer.

If only it was that simple!
However, goals per minutes, he is 2nd to Mitrovic, that's a fact. Question marks over his all round contribution though. I thought he offered little last night.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It’s the punishment you get for trying to run your club without racking up massive debts.

barnsley lost £4 million in a year in the last published accounts. They are running a higher wage bill than us and Luton having increased the wage bill by around 30% - cash flow has improved as I assume they’ve took out the EFL loan - there is a loan taken out in the accounts which is around the same as the wage increase

I can’t see unless contracts cover a wage reduction how they are sustainable going forward if relegated
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
barnsley lost £4 million in a year in the last published accounts. They are running a higher wage bill than us and Luton having increased the wage bill by around 30% - cash flow has improved as I assume they’ve took out the EFL loan - there is a loan taken out in the accounts which is around the same as the wage increase

I can’t see unless contracts cover a wage reduction how they are sustainable going forward if relegated

Which again begs the question why are the owners hanging around?
This is probably as much as the club is going to be worth under their stewardship.
Our crowds will start to dwindle if we don't start well next season, every year that ticks down on the rental agreement must be detrimental to the clubs value, I can't understand their motivation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Which again begs the question why are the owners hanging around?
This is probably as much as the club is going to be worth under their stewardship.
Our crowds will start to dwindle if we don't start well next season, every year that ticks down on the rental agreement must be detrimental to the clubs value, I can't understand their motivation.

I'm guessing their plan has been the same since Robins came back. To accumulate and sell intangible assets (players) in order to gradually pay off the debt.

I'd imagine the hope is that now we're in the Championship that revenue will be earned more quickly as the potential of earning more from player sales is greater.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Which again begs the question why are the owners hanging around?
This is probably as much as the club is going to be worth under their stewardship.
Our crowds will start to dwindle if we don't start well next season, every year that ticks down on the rental agreement must be detrimental to the clubs value, I can't understand their motivation.

because I assume they see they can satisfy investor returns going forward

the club is a means to satisfy returns to anonymous investors. There is no emotion just a calculation which wikk rapidly adjust when needed

I personally think Ryton will be sold and a cheap option at Warwick university will be found and clearly selling players at this level will mean a better return for the investors which is all Sisu care about m

Why would they sell? What is there to sell?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
We're likely to be in a relegation battle again next season, with such a heavy fixture list early season we can't go into it with such little depth to the squad especially given at least one of our best players will be sold this summer. The last few weeks has exposed this lack of depth
At this stage I agree it will be more of a struggle next season, but I thought this one might be as well and it's gone far better than I was expecting overall.

We have no idea who we may be able to get in on loan, who we can bring in to replace those who will be released, whether we might be able to offload the likes of Walker and Waghorn to reuse their wages. Will we sell one of the crown jewels to bring in a couple of others? We've had seasons wherre the summer recruitment looked pretty decent but didn't live up to expectations and others who arrived with little fanfare and exceeded them. Will other clubs suddenly find themselves in a Derby type situation with points deductions?

So while I'm thinking next season will be harder, I'm not going to write us off without seeing what we manage to do in the summer.
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
because I assume they see they can satisfy investor returns going forward

the club is a means to satisfy returns to anonymous investors. There is no emotion just a calculation which wikk rapidly adjust when needed

I personally think Ryton will be sold and a cheap option at Warwick university will be found and clearly selling players at this level will mean a better return for the investors which is all Sisu care about m

Why would they sell? What is there to sell?
Are they actually paying out interest on the loans to investors? Genuine question, i honestly got so lost in that shit that i just forgot about it.

Even if they are, they are never actually going to get the principal back are they that they put in/plug the gaps with?
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
If he’s second only to Mitrovic then he’s likely to be getting some serious interest over the summer.
You keep making this point.

The fact is that he is second to Mitrovic in terms of scoring rate, unless you descend to Grendel stats level, in which case Tavares and some guy from Stoke who has also scored one goal are ahead of him.

His shooting and heading ability is really beyond doubt at this level as evidenced by the statistics. Apart from that his game is limited, although I feel he has developed that this season. However, having a consistent goalscorer is really important. We have great players in Hamer, Sheaf and O'Hare but without Godden and Gyokeres' goals we would be in danger of relegation in my view.

Although his skills outside the box are limited they are far superior to Walker's in my view. His movement is better and he gives the ball away much less.

On the issue of his value in the transfer market which you keep raising, no one thinks it is high because of his age. Strikers tend to decline at an earlier age but I feel he will be useful player for us for a few years.

I know you rate Walker very highly. I still feel he has potential but he really has to do far more to develop his game. At the moment he is a penalty box finisher only and poor in the air There is no reason why he shouldn't be able to improve and if he does his value would be far greater than Godden's. But it is a question of whether Walker does develop his all round game. Time is on his side for now.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Why are we definitely relegation battlers next season? I don’t see us doing anything different to the likes of Millwall, Preston and Luton and they’re doing alright.

I’m comfortable in saying we’ll be better than Birmingham, Hull, Blackpool, Bristol City, Rotherham,Reading/Derby/Barnsley,Wigan, whoever wins the play offs in league one, Stoke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
because I assume they see they can satisfy investor returns going forward

the club is a means to satisfy returns to anonymous investors. There is no emotion just a calculation which wikk rapidly adjust when needed

I personally think Ryton will be sold and a cheap option at Warwick university will be found and clearly selling players at this level will mean a better return for the investors which is all Sisu care about m

Why would they sell? What is there to sell?
And effectively we started from net zero a while ago too. We have an asset (if not one worth much!) that requires little in the way of funding that also potentially opens the door to other investment opportunities, so we've moved from high risk high reward to low risk really. Holding onto the club appears to be more a time cost than anything else just atm.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
because I assume they see they can satisfy investor returns going forward

the club is a means to satisfy returns to anonymous investors. There is no emotion just a calculation which wikk rapidly adjust when needed

I personally think Ryton will be sold and a cheap option at Warwick university will be found and clearly selling players at this level will mean a better return for the investors which is all Sisu care about m

Why would they sell? What is there to sell?
Paxman valued the club at £60m
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
You keep making this point.

The fact is that he is second to Mitrovic in terms of scoring rate, unless you descend to Grendel stats level, in which case Tavares and some guy from Stoke who has also scored one goal are ahead of him.

His shooting and heading ability is really beyond doubt at this level as evidenced by the statistics. Apart from that his game is limited, although I feel he has developed that this season. However, having a consistent goalscorer is really important. We have great players in Hamer, Sheaf and O'Hare but without Godden and Gyokeres' goals we would be in danger of relegation in my view.

Although his skills outside the box are limited they are far superior to Walker's in my view. His movement is better and he gives the ball away much less.

On the issue of his value in the transfer market which you keep raising, no one thinks it is high because of his age. Strikers tend to decline at an earlier age but I feel he will be useful player for us for a few years.

I know you rate Walker very highly. I still feel he has potential but he really has to do far more to develop his game. At the moment he is a penalty box finisher only and poor in the air There is no reason why he shouldn't be able to improve and if he does his value would be far greater than Godden's. But it is a question of whether Walker does develop his all round game. Time is on his side for now.
Waghorn went for £5m when he was 28 I think, so clubs do still stump up money for older players.
 

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
At this stage I agree it will be more of a struggle next season, but I thought this one might be as well and it's gone far better than I was expecting overall.

We have no idea who we may be able to get in on loan, who we can bring in to replace those who will be released, whether we might be able to offload the likes of Walker and Waghorn to reuse their wages. Will we sell one of the crown jewels to bring in a couple of others? We've had seasons wherre the summer recruitment looked pretty decent but didn't live up to expectations and others who arrived with little fanfare and exceeded them. Will other clubs suddenly find themselves in a Derby type situation with points deductions?

So while I'm thinking next season will be harder, I'm not going to write us off without seeing what we manage to do in the summer.

I very much doubt Robins will look to move Waghorn on.
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
Fuck me this place is bleak after a loss.

We have been great year after year and it's the same after every rocky patch the doom mongers start up.

We might sell players in the summer but we will also buy players to replace them, that's football. You only have to stop and think about how much the club have got right in recruitment and general decision making in the last few years to have some confidence it will be ok.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Waghorn went for £5m when he was 28 I think, so clubs do still stump up money for older players.
Pre-covid and when Derby were splashing money about like it was going out of fashion, very different ball game nowadays I think championship clubs splashing that sort of money on one player being few and far between now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top