Goal or no goal (5 Viewers)

[steve cooper]

It would have counted if the earth was flat.
Maybe that explains some of the conspiracy theorists that are afraid to change their minds. (The earth is round by the way)

I'm sorry but you are wrong about that as well. The earth is ellipsoid in shape, more like a rugby ball than a football.

The earth's shape is an ellipsoid

www.geo.hunter.cuny.edu

 

---

[Liquid Gold]

I think if the earth was on the back of a space turtle it would have rolled in

 

[Johhny Blue]

It’s essentially a ve

I'm sorry but you are wrong about that as well. The earth is ellipsoid in shape, more like a rugby ball than a football.

The earth's shape is an ellipsoid

www.geo.hunter.cuny.edu

I stand corrected. Are you a wasp?

 

[Otis]

Thought there was ball technology.

Why isn't there? It would be a good idea to have it, cos then we would know whether the ball was over the line or not

 

[JAM See]

Fantastic thread.

Devoted to whether we should have lost 2-1 or 2-0.

8 pages. Great work.

(It wasn't in by the way, the whole of the ball has to cross the whole of the line)

 

[Warwickhunt]

Theres not want about it, we were shit and deserved nothing from the game

It was close but it's crossed the line

goals change games! that was a goal!

 

[Liquid Gold]

goals change games! that was a goal!

And all you need for a goal is for the ball to nearly cross the line

 

[shmmeee]

Fantastic thread.

Devoted to whether we should have lost 2-1 or 2-0.

8 pages. Great work.

(It wasn't in by the way, the whole of the ball has to cross the whole of the line)

Yeah but have you seen this screenshot of a photo of a recording of a TV screen replay I’ve got?

 

[Liquid Gold]

Yeah but have you seen this screenshot of a photo of a recording of a TV screen replay I’ve got?

EFL conspiracy

 

[Nick]

Has anybody noticed the ball in the image isn't the ball we actually played with?

 

[shmmeee]

Has anybody noticed the ball in the image isn't the ball we actually played with?

The Ricoh pitch has different grass too. Almost like it’s a reconstructed virtual image and not a photo

 

[Warwickhunt]

And all you need for a goal is for the ball to nearly cross the line

i actually sit directly in line with the goal line and there was a clear space between the ball and the post, why have they not released the Hawkeye picture yet then to displell the doubt?

 

[Liquid Gold]

i actually sit directly in line with the goal line and there was a clear space between the ball and the post, why have they not released the Hawkeye picture yet then to displell the doubt?

It's literally in this thread.

You saw what you wanted to.

 

[Johhny Blue]

i actually sit directly in line with the goal line and there was a clear space between the ball and the post, why have they not released the Hawkeye picture yet then to displell the doubt?

The only doubt is from a few of our fans that refuse to see the evidence.

 

[MalcSB]

It's literally in this thread.

You saw what you wanted to.

The image is taken at the wrong point in the incident.

 

[Liquid Gold]

The image is taken at the wrong point in the incident.

 

[Johhny Blue]

The image is taken at the wrong point in the incident.

Can you explain in simple words how you think the system works?

 

[rexo87]

Thought there was ball technology.

That doesn't satisfy some people. It's like people arguing with a kettle about when the kettle says the water is boiling

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

 

[Otis]

But what if the water is just over the boiling point?

 

[Gynnsthetonic]

I still think it was over the line!

 

[Johhny Blue]

I still think it was over the line!

I still don’t think Godden was offside against Rotherham a couple of years ago