Ratings (8 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
harvey098
Well-Known Member
Moore - 5
Dabo - 8 - brilliant defensively. Won pretty much every duel.
Rose - 5
Hyam - 5
Bidwell - 5
Kane - 5
Allen - 5
Hamer - 7
Sheaf - 5.5
O’Hare - 5 - most am’s in the league take one of the two good chances he had tonight)
Gyok - 6 - had to carve out a lot for himself.
Dabo - 8 - brilliant defensively. Won pretty much every duel.
Rose - 5
Hyam - 5
Bidwell - 5
Kane - 5
Allen - 5
Hamer - 7
Sheaf - 5.5
O’Hare - 5 - most am’s in the league take one of the two good chances he had tonight)
Gyok - 6 - had to carve out a lot for himself.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
hamer was dire
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
Moore - 4
Kane - 5
Hyam - 4
Rose - 4
Bidwell - 6
Dabo - 7
Hamer - 5
Sheaf - 5
Allen - 5
O’Hare - 5
Gyokeres - 6
Kane - 5
Hyam - 4
Rose - 4
Bidwell - 6
Dabo - 7
Hamer - 5
Sheaf - 5
Allen - 5
O’Hare - 5
Gyokeres - 6
Blind-Faith
Well-Known Member
Moore 6
Dabo 7 motm
Bidwell 6
Rose 4
Hyam 5
Kane 5
Sheaf 5
Hamer 6
Allen 5
Ohare 4
Vik 6
That was bloody awful
Dabo 7 motm
Bidwell 6
Rose 4
Hyam 5
Kane 5
Sheaf 5
Hamer 6
Allen 5
Ohare 4
Vik 6
That was bloody awful
harvey098
Well-Known Member
Thought you’d only have negatives to say. How about “Dabo did well”.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
you rated him far too high. He had a ooor game.
harvey098
Well-Known Member
Assume (hope) you’re still talking about Hamer and not Dabo. He was comfortably a 7.. if we win or get a draw he’d get a 7 without question there. It’s only because we lost it clouds judgement. He was a class above again and probably the only player on the pitch that can create that chance he did for O’Hare who took way too long and fluffed it.
trakia plovdiv
Member
Ha ha ha ha bonk (*dies laughing)
Grendel
Well-Known Member
no one else agrees with you on hamer
harvey098
Well-Known Member
No one else agrees with you on most things so I wouldn’t take that line of argument if I were you
Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
Were we really that bad tonight?! I thought we did quite well against a very good side at this level.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Bidwell 5 is extremely harsh
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Moore 6
Kane 6
Dabo 7
Hyam 6
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Sheaf 4
Hamer 7
Allen 5
O'Hare 7
Gyokeres 7
Kane 6
Dabo 7
Hyam 6
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Sheaf 4
Hamer 7
Allen 5
O'Hare 7
Gyokeres 7
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
I agree with him
Grendel
Well-Known Member
he was one of the better players
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Agreed. Thought him and Dabo did alright against their 2 danger men
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
A few players were really poor, but most were ok. Things didn't always come off for O'Hare, Hamer and Gyokeres but at least there was hope when they were involved.
Moore 6 (thought he could have been more decisive at times but don't really think he could have kept out both goals)
Kane 6 (a couple of decent interchanges and one good piece of cover play but otherwise mediocre)
Hyam 5 (2 good blocks, particularly the one in 1st half but totally bullied by Davis)
Rose 5 (some dire passes but did improve as game went on)
Bidwell 8 (another solid performance)
Dabo 8 motm (defended very well against a very good player)
Sheaf 6 (best hit shot from us. Some decent moments but generally quiet)
Hamer 5 (most ineffective game for a while. Nice pass to O'Hare though late on)
Allen 5 (passing not up to usual standard. Should have scored)
O'Hare 4 (one decent pass to Gyokeres but nearly every other time he lost the ball through bad control or passing. Should have scored at least 2)
Gyokeres 6 (held the ball up really well but thankless job when those around weren't able to make use of it. Missed good early chance)
Tavares 5 (doesn't look comfortable when the ball isn't played to feet. One nice piece of skill, which Maatsen squandered)
Maatsen 4 (looked disinterested to me. Didn't see anything constructive)
Howley 4 (looked really nervous and some poor first touches didn't help. He kept showing for the ball though)
Kane 6 (a couple of decent interchanges and one good piece of cover play but otherwise mediocre)
Hyam 5 (2 good blocks, particularly the one in 1st half but totally bullied by Davis)
Rose 5 (some dire passes but did improve as game went on)
Bidwell 8 (another solid performance)
Dabo 8 motm (defended very well against a very good player)
Sheaf 6 (best hit shot from us. Some decent moments but generally quiet)
Hamer 5 (most ineffective game for a while. Nice pass to O'Hare though late on)
Allen 5 (passing not up to usual standard. Should have scored)
O'Hare 4 (one decent pass to Gyokeres but nearly every other time he lost the ball through bad control or passing. Should have scored at least 2)
Gyokeres 6 (held the ball up really well but thankless job when those around weren't able to make use of it. Missed good early chance)
Tavares 5 (doesn't look comfortable when the ball isn't played to feet. One nice piece of skill, which Maatsen squandered)
Maatsen 4 (looked disinterested to me. Didn't see anything constructive)
Howley 4 (looked really nervous and some poor first touches didn't help. He kept showing for the ball though)
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Think they are fair ratings but is probably put O’Hare up to a 6
harvey098
Well-Known Member
Really? (I gave him MOTM in the last ratings thread btw so no vendetta)
Was at fault for our first when he could’ve just knocked out for a corner, passing was poor (he literally just panicked and booted it down the line to no one about 3-4 times) and the whole defence was run ragged by Davis, understandbly so - he looks a player.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Moore 5
Hyam 5
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Dabo 7
Kane 5
Hamer 6
Sheaf 6
Allen 6
O'Hare 6
Gyokeres 6
Subs
Tavares 5
Maatsen 5
Howley 5
We've played a lot lot worse than that but two mistakes from the centre backs didn't help our cause.
Ultimately we just do not have the squad depth of quality to sustain a push and losing a key player like McFadz at this point has been disastrous
Hyam 5
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Dabo 7
Kane 5
Hamer 6
Sheaf 6
Allen 6
O'Hare 6
Gyokeres 6
Subs
Tavares 5
Maatsen 5
Howley 5
We've played a lot lot worse than that but two mistakes from the centre backs didn't help our cause.
Ultimately we just do not have the squad depth of quality to sustain a push and losing a key player like McFadz at this point has been disastrous
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Yeah think you must have watched a different game to me. Davis played off Hyam Mainly and Bidwell was tasked with Johnson and Spence and did very well
Grendel
Well-Known Member
dabo is better when defending
harvey098
Well-Known Member
He and Johnson interchanged. Whole defence bar Dabo were poor tonight and Bidwell literally cost us the first goal with some comical defending.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Yeah you’re wrong IMO, and it seems people agree with me
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
O'Hare was poor but comparing him to other attacking midfielders who are on, in most cases 20-30k a week isn't worth doing. We know where he's at, and we know he doesn't score goals. Same with Allen. A goalscoring attacking midfielder is the aim in the summer but we won't be able to afford one.
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Always been a fan of Sheaf but he was abysmal tonight.
harvey098
Well-Known Member
Moore 6
Rose 5
Hyam 6
Bidwell 6 Has been much more impressive as a LCB
Dabo 6 MOTM
Sheaf 6
Hamer 6 One of his irritating performances where he’s clearly overplaying
Kane 6
Allen 5
O’Hare 6 Very unlucky not to score
Gyokeres 6 Some moments of absolute magic followed by the usual crap finishing
Maatsen 5
Tavares 5 Would be amazed (and at this stage disappointed) if he’s one of our striking options next year
Howley 5 A textbook example of why just throwing the kids on doesn’t always work
Rose 5
Hyam 6
Bidwell 6 Has been much more impressive as a LCB
Dabo 6 MOTM
Sheaf 6
Hamer 6 One of his irritating performances where he’s clearly overplaying
Kane 6
Allen 5
O’Hare 6 Very unlucky not to score
Gyokeres 6 Some moments of absolute magic followed by the usual crap finishing
Maatsen 5
Tavares 5 Would be amazed (and at this stage disappointed) if he’s one of our striking options next year
Howley 5 A textbook example of why just throwing the kids on doesn’t always work