Oh yeah don’t get me wrong I’m sure having spoken to George and Martin reeves and the deputy guy the decision was best for the city as a whole. We could argue the merits of that and not agree but at least we could argue
I was gobsmacked by George and Martin saying to our faces that having a successful professional football club wasn’t important. They changed their tune when We said that doesn’t make any sense given the good will and celebration on winning league 2 play off. They then talked about it making a £25m or so difference in a budget of £400m but it’s still a lot of money.
The other side of course is should I be more bothered about the proper funding and resource time in children's services or supporting the football club and even with my broadest prejudiced sky blue glasses I would prefer time and money to be spent on children's services rather than the football club
I know it’s not black and white and one or other
For me Pete, it was pretty black and white. The council lied to everyone in the city about doing a deal with Wasps - that's CCFC, CRFC, and the public. Flat out lied. Said one thing, did another.
Then they unanimously voted the deal through on three undertakings (red-lines, in modern parlance):
1) It wouldn't hurt CCFC.
2) It wouldn't hurt CRFC.
3) Wasps would build a training ground etc. in the city, creating jobs and income.
Notably, and it was obvious to anyone who was paying attention, they then sold the ground on the cheap without making any attempt to make sure those promises would be kept. All three were subsequently broken - CCFC ended up in
Northampton (edit: Birmingham, duh.), Wasps make no attempt to stop their fixtures clashing with CRFC, and after directly threatening CCFC's academy, Wasps have eventually moved their entire operation to Henley-in-Arden (also screwing the locals there, as an aside).
Putting aside the ethics of encouraging another team to move 100 miles from their support, in itself the whole thing was an act of simply astonishing incompetence and mendacity, and quite possibly, malice.
And before anyone shouts 'SISU apologist', just don't, OK. SISU have always been in it for themselves - but elected representatives and council officers should and must be held to a higher standard.