SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
I’m getting Dale Evans vibes
I’m getting Dale Evans vibes
I’m getting Dale Evans vibes
I agree. His company's website looks OK and they're advertising a large number of jobs, but hard to see how he's got anything like the means to take on Derby. It's only a piece of software and it's basically not much more than a startup
I very much doubt he'll be using his own money.
I know, but who's money is it and who would entrust somebody with no experience in football to be in charge of their investment? I reckon the bloke is a grifter
They would probably better off with Ashley at least you know what you get with him.
They would absolutely be better off with Ashley
Well that'd be a better position than they're in currently, to actually make a surplus might be a startAshley will cream off any surpluses that Derby accrue, if he applies the same model as when at Newcastle.
The bank holidays of course weren't known about in advanceall the excuses in the book
Well I never seen this one coming
certainly no different to the Bury situationThey must be seriously in trouble if it doesn’t go through as they shouldn’t be allowed to start the season unless Ashley can rush it through.
certainly no different to the Bury situation
One team in deep financial trouble having already suffered a points deduction for administration and after massive over spending, and the only real potential backer pulled out - the other was BuryIt’s totally different
BBC reporting the deal has collapsed
Step in Mike Ashley to get a bargain albeit with a 15 point deduction next season.
Will the EFL give enough time to go down that route?
One team in deep financial trouble having already suffered a points deduction for administration and after massive over spending, and the only real potential backer pulled out - the other was Bury
They should throw the book at Derby...i mean how many deadlines have they missed, then had extended, and then missed etc etc ?There's a meeting today apparently so we'll soon find out.
Let him without sin cast the first stone, not sure the club can be penalised for the actions of a prospective new ownerThey should throw the book at Derby...i mean how many deadlines have they missed, then had extended, and then missed etc etc ?
All this on top of their recent financial shenanigans.
But they won't, because Derby is a 'big club', and in reality, the EFL only really care about 'big clubs', and will let the smaller, less well supported clubs, go to the wall.
They should throw the book at Derby...i mean how many deadlines have they missed, then had extended, and then missed etc etc ?
All this on top of their recent financial shenanigans.
But they won't, because Derby is a 'big club', and in reality, the EFL only really care about 'big clubs', and will let the smaller, less well supported clubs, go to the wall.
According to the BBC Radio Derby guy, last month's wages, which Kirchner said he had paid, were not paid by him.
I’m getting Dale Evans vibes
I think the administrators were appointed by Mel Morris, so he'll be advising them to do a deal with whoever gets him the best deal. I suspect Ashley would play harderball on the stadium more than the yank would.From the outside looking in it has seemed a little strange that the Administrators would have gone with Kirchner given his previous at Preston, over Ashley who clearly has the finances to buy the club. Are Administrators answerable to any authority for their decision making, or do they just coin it come what may?
On a selfish CCFC note this could be a setback in offloading Waghorn as a return to Derby would probably be one of his preferred options.
Mate who is a Derby fan reckons they are paying that firm 1.5 mill a month to sort their takeover