Transfer Shouts (62 Viewers)
- Thread starter Tea & Busquets
- Start date
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
Anything to appease the Premier League followers! Former Chelsea midfielder (0 apps) must be how he introduces himself
Winny the Bish
Well-Known Member
We've been linked with a move for Derby's Lee Buchanan, who could be available for free due to a contract dispute. Stoke and Werder Bremen apparently also interested.
Would take him over McCallum in a heartbeat.
Would take him over McCallum in a heartbeat.
Last edited:
Bertola
Well-Known Member
McCallum every day of the week for me
Tea & Busquets
Well-Known Member
would take whoever fits a couple factors the best.
first factor being is their signing a loan or permanent? whoever is a perm would be my choice as i’m tired of loaning in a starting lwb.
the second, more important factor being will their signing be economical? if we sign buchanan for a fee, will we be able to strengthen other, more needed areas of the squad the same as if we were to loan in McCallum?
just something’s to think about, personally just comparing the two i wouldn’t mind either.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
What a final post if it was the end
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
I think they just read my post about perhaps we should look at him and thought they would turn it into a rumour
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
Buchanan would be a free on lower wages so would be better economically, McCallum is the better player though, but about the same age, I would love to have Sam back but if we can have our own LWB I would go for Buchanan, again I still think they read my suggestion and turned it into a “rumour”
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
hi what does pedigree mean
Tea & Busquets
Well-Known Member
means he’s got nice hair
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
but seriously
Means we can display him at Crufts in best of breed
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
Esoterica
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't expect too much movement on the first couple of days back. Maybe a few star jumps and squats.
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
He is having an extended break because of being with Sweden
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Been given extra time off due to international squad selection.
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
It's likely he won't be back yet due to his Nations League stint with Sweden.
Alkhen
Well-Known Member
he has an extra week or so off as he had 4 international games at the end of the season
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
The ones not with them are Kane and Walker I think
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Guessing honeymoon...
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
Surely thats a wind up
PUSB-We_are_going_up
Well-Known Member
Robins said he may have to manage him more and try keep him fit for longer periods of the season and have him train slightly less
Tea & Busquets
Well-Known Member
Obviously not the entire squad but Kane not in any training pics, could he be off already? @Skybluebeliever @better days
It actually wasn't I'd totally forgot about the nations. That's me told... 5 times over
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
He was with the group yesterday of 23s
Yeah it is but surely you have to then be back by start of pre season?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Extended break
Tea & Busquets
Well-Known Member
Ah right, so he knows he’s being binned then eh? surprised Waggy was not with that bunch, does Robins see something in him?
SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
I’m not sure, maybe he’s a reasonable chap and no reason to make his life difficult, just hasn’t worked out
Winny the Bish
Well-Known Member
Did someone say 'Bomb Squad'?
Great_Expectations
Well-Known Member
Stating the obvious I know; but sooner we can get rid of Kane the better.
Closely followed by Waghorn - who I don’t hate as much as others on here do, but from the ITK posts he wants first team football which is fair enough.
Then Walker - I actually think there is a decent player there, he just isn’t adaptable enough and doesn’t work with our system.
First two are priorities though - we don’t want players who don’t want to be here and/or have an attitude around the rest of the team and new players. Plus Kane is pretty awful at football.
Closely followed by Waghorn - who I don’t hate as much as others on here do, but from the ITK posts he wants first team football which is fair enough.
Then Walker - I actually think there is a decent player there, he just isn’t adaptable enough and doesn’t work with our system.
First two are priorities though - we don’t want players who don’t want to be here and/or have an attitude around the rest of the team and new players. Plus Kane is pretty awful at football.