Do you want to discuss boring politics? (117 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
My most controversial political opinion is that we should scrap the green belt.

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
where have i ever said i agreed with republican violence?

show me

you agree with Gerry Adams - who agreed with republican violence and think it’s funny - I don’t think if you said you agreed with Hitler as he made the trains run on time it would wash David as this doesnt, as does your use of anti Protestant slurs, jokes about giving money to Sinn Fein for charity

You support Adams you support violence

At least you seem to be questioning yourself which is something I suppose

Charming family aren’t they? Daddy helped form the Prov Ira and brother raped his own daughter
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Er…you think I’m putting them in to defend David? So anyone who has a picture of Johnson on a thread - is a Johnson fan?

No. You say putting Gerry Adams as his avatar is awful.

You then post endless Adams gifs as a laugh?

You either think it's awful behaviour or you think it's a laugh. Which is it?

Standard hypocrisy from you.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’m sorry Steve but if the leader of the Labour Party is too embarrassed for his MPs to appear publicly in support of working people that’s the worse look. The clue’s in the name.

Meanwhile Truss can talk about banning the right to strike altogether and that isn’t seen as an extreme position? Shows how far to the right the country has lurched

The Morning Mail at it again, saying “don’t go on the picket line” is not saying “don’t support”. Just like how you support City without being on the pitch.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No. You say putting Gerry Adams as his avatar is awful.

You then post endless Adams gifs as a laugh?

You either think it's awful behaviour or you think it's a laugh. Which is it?

Standard hypocrisy from you.

so when CVD has Johnson on his avatar that’s wrong?

My views on Adams are well known and this again is an example of your binary view - o day support labour so you have to interject

Keep out of it you have no idea what you are talking about
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
No. You say putting Gerry Adams as his avatar is awful.

You then post endless Adams gifs as a laugh?

You either think it's awful behaviour or you think it's a laugh. Which is it?

Standard hypocrisy from you.
standard grenners

best thing is i'll admit i was probably wrong to do so
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
you agree with Gerry Adams - who agreed with republican violence and think it’s funny - I don’t think if you said you agreed with Hitler as he made the trains run on time it would wash David as this doesnt, as does your use of anti Protestant slurs, jokes about giving money to Sinn Fein for charity

You support Adams you support violence

At least you seem to be questioning yourself which is something I suppose

Charming family aren’t they? Daddy helped form the Prov Ira and brother raped his own daughter
So you admit to being a racist because you support Boris Johnson. Are you really going there with this? It’s very childish to think that because you agree with someone on one point you must agree with them on everything. Anyone who voted Blair was pro Iraqi war, anyone who voted Brexit is a racist because all racists voted brexit, anyone who voted brexit thinks covid was a hoax and are anti vaxxers because literally anyone in the public selling that nonsense also voted leave. That’s where you are with this. Grow up.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
so when CVD has Johnson on his avatar that’s wrong?

My views on Adams are well known and this again is an example of your binary view - o day support labour so you have to interject

Keep out of it you have no idea what you are talking about

No because I don't see CVD saying that anyone posting a photo of Johnson is bang out of order.

Adams as avatar = vile behaviour
Posting endless gifs of Adams = banter

That's what you're saying.

It's pathetic. Its standard hypocrisy from you.

And has nothing to do with Labour ffs.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
David I’m really not flapping. What racism - what now?
you defended adm where he posted his now deleted for being racist racism towards me

you said it was ok to call me anything

i know you are a serial liar but come on now
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No because I don't see CVD saying that anyone posting a photo of Johnson is bang out of order.

Adams as avatar = vile behaviour
Posting endless gifs of Adams = banter

That's what you're saying.

It's pathetic. Its standard hypocrisy from you.

And has nothing to do with Labour ffs.

Do you think Charlie Chaplin was a Nazi?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
you defended adm where he posted his now deleted for being racist racism towards me

you said it was ok to call me anything

i know you are a serial liar but come on now

I don’t consider Irish catholics a race David and yes I think it’s perfectly acceptable to call you anything as you advocate violence against other posters, defame them at every opportunity.

also you are about as Irish as I am
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I don’t consider Irish catholics a race David and yes I think it’s perfectly acceptable to call you anything as you advocate violence against other posters, defame them at every opportunity.

also you are about as Irish as I am
thank you for admitting you are a racist

now posts where are they
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I must say it's pretty sad when, in a day and age when even most of the reactionary Tories are more of a bygones be byones position (and given the Brighton bomb, some of them would have just cause to be antagonistic) people on a message board still debate peoples' positions in the Troubles.

How about condemning all violence, and being delighted a peace process was started, and being determined to ensure that isn't damaged by current affairs - not a bad start, is it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You're the one trying to twist away from the link you posted. Has he been shown to be a member of the IRA?

Im really not it’s well known he’s avoided every claim but if when William Whitelaw had a meeting with the provisional IRA in 1972 to negotiate a cease fire and six from the IRA attended that meeting would you say all six were involved in that process?

unfortunate behaviour here from you - it seems you won’t answer if Mr Adams was a director and supporter of violence and terror including an assination attempt of a prime minister
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Im really not it’s well known he’s avoided every claim but if when William Whitelaw had a meeting with the provisional IRA in 1972 to negotiate a cease fire and six from the IRA attended that meeting would you say all six were involved in that process?

unfortunate behaviour here from you - it seems you won’t answer if Mr Adams was a director and supporter of violence and terror including an assumption attempt of a prime minister
Unfortunate behaviour from you, O'Day, ADM and anybody who joins in this childish nonsense really. How about following the example of the adults (yes, even some Tories) and starting afresh.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
For the record, IRA = bad, UDA = bad, UVF = bad. It really shouldn't need to be said, as all but an imbecile would see that as obvious but hey, this thread is being reduced to a thread of imbeciles.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Unfortunate behaviour from you, O'Day, ADM and anybody who joins in this childish nonsense really. How about following the example of the adults (yes, even some Tories) and starting afresh.

If he ignores me I will ignore him buthe and ADM insist on sniping at me even when I am not talking to them.

All i want is for him to back up what he says, he's a hero when he thinks I'm not going to reply and a fanny when I do,

He's also admitted he's a racist and a liar
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I must say it's pretty sad when, in a day and age when even most of the reactionary Tories are more of a bygones be byones position (and given the Brighton bomb, some of them would have just cause to be antagonistic) people on a message board still debate peoples' positions in the Troubles.

How about condemning all violence, and being delighted a peace process was started, and being determined to ensure that isn't damaged by current affairs - not a bad start, is it.
People should look at the work of Jo Berry (an actual victim of the Brighton bombing) including her work and relationship with Patrick Magee. She’s inspirational.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
If he ignores me I will ignore him buthe and ADM insist on sniping at me even when I am not talking to them.

All i want is for him to back up what he says, he's a hero when he thinks I'm not going to reply and a fanny when I do,

He's also admitted he's a racist and a liar

Well I think admitting it was an error should be where the line is drawn
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
For the record, IRA = bad, UDA = bad, UVF = bad. It really shouldn't need to be said, as all but an imbecile would see that as obvious but hey, this thread is being reduced to a thread of imbeciles.

I agree all terrorist organisations are bad.

I am being accused of supporting one though by a racist and an apologist for racism
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top