One of the worst suggestions on this forum in some time
Its not a suggestion it’s an wxample
It’s the reverse of what’s being suggested on here. Namely wasps should not have taken on the games without considering us and spending a £100 grand on a pitch
They wouldn’t would they? Yet many on here are saying they should do the reverse logic has to apply I’m afraid
Should they have improved the surface at the expense of their playing budget? Highly doubt their fans would be keen on that either
We as an organisation could have looked at various alternatives - rent negotiation, grants, loans, player budgets - the figure is believed to be about £100 grand
As someone else said - the owners seem to be enjoying this