What options do the club have though?
There are independent experts saying it's unsafe, it's not as if it's just a bit shit and we are moaning that we can't play our style of football on it.
That's what comes down to I really don't know if they've sat on their hands until this point.
There is the very real possibility that we could indeed have paid for better maintenance / repairs / new pitch etc. If that makes us more viable it may very well not have been the fair option, but it may have been the right option for the club. Even, plans to play elsewhere / sort away games only etc. Now we ultimately really don't know what efforts were made, so it's unfair to either blame or praise really as they may well have busted a gut to try and resolve or... they may not.
But all that applies now, for that matter. What's actually going on ref: the pitch now? It seems we're back to the days of finger pointing all over the place, where we need somebody to do something, even if in a Father Ted type of way. If the pitch is unsafe, as you say that's a bit more than it being a bit shit, so how long to make it safe? if we reverse games with other clubs for a bit, how unsafe will it be in March, or whenever we play eleventy billion home games in a row? And, of course, reversing games will cost us cash flow.
But it's clear, even now, we need some kind of plan ourselves for the mdeium term, we're currently lurching short term and hoping it works itself out. If we accept Wasps are shits and won't spend anything that's well and good, but what's *our* plan off the back of that beyond heading for mediation and, off the back of that, potential litigation?
www.rugbypass.com
