Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
Diego Costa has had his appeal won
Why cant we get ours overturned for that Rente then?
Why cant we get ours overturned for that Rente then?
Diego Costa has had his appeal won
Why cant we get ours overturned for that Rente then?
But was that dependent on player/players going out ? apart from the “big”three Todd Kane was expected to go but didn’t, neither did Waghorn or Walker either or both would have been moved on all three high earners. I would love a freebie or two we bloody need them likely to be mature and experience but can’t see it they command top dollarMR was trying to sign players (plural) on deadline day and stated that the club had approved that, so there is money available.
He only got 10 points I think so wasn’t close, Costa got 13
Yes, as the season ticked over he lost the required pointsWould he have got enough points if Heracles were still in the Eredivisie? If not, it makes you wonder why they bothered in the first place.
He only got 10 points I think so wasn’t close, Costa got 13
Of course they would do.We got no money and nobody would want to take on the job under that restriction!
If no one has money then I must have dreamt of all those other Championship teams not standing still and spending money.No one has money. Most clubs are run as companies not hobbies and people demand a return on their investment, even superfans. We have a management team that could possibly one day get us to the premiership. If MR left, at best we would be a bottom half championship club that would fight for relegation each year. But, that is not only us, half the league are in the same situation.
Hyam had to be sold to balance the books. No one wanted him to go including himself. SISU have stated the club must be run autonomously and everyone include MR and his team know that. We need a few additions, but we do not have the resources to bring in anyone, unless we got rid of someone or two. MR is a battler, he was the same as a player. He more than anyone will put 100% into the project and SISU know that. I know MR and Joy have a very good working relationship and Joy knows that CCFC could not do any better than having MR as it's head.
I think as supporters we can only take one situation at a time and hope and pray for the best.
But was that dependent on player/players going out ? apart from the “big”three Todd Kane was expected to go but didn’t, neither did Waghorn or Walker either or both would have been moved on all three high earners. I would love a freebie or two we bloody need them likely to be mature and experience but can’t see it they command top dollar
Does show why selling Hyam so late was a bad move mind you, no time if the deals fall through to get someone else inMR was trying to sign players (plural) on deadline day and stated that the club had approved that, so there is money available.
Scroll down a bit, and someone says:Bright enbokhare
Remember him when we played Coventry in the 5 4 game looked a right handful Free agent aged 24 worth a punt if he's fit until January?www.readytogo.net
I mean its true, the bloke has 0 senseScroll down a bit, and someone says:
“He’s about as Bright as an eclipse”.
You don’t know footballers then I would say £5k a week is a minimum for established players these players have had years on good money their piggy banks will be well stocked and then there’s the signing on fee, that can be a three figure sum, expensive world pro. football especially at championship level.You don't tend to command top dollar when you're unemployed.
If you get to this point and they are still a free agents, you've got to question their desire to play. Their agents would be knocking down doors to get them in on trial.You don’t know footballers then I would say £5k a week is a minimum for established players these players have had years on good money their piggy banks will be well stocked and then there’s the signing on fee, that can be a three figure sum, expensive world pro. football especially at championship level.
Costa was a free agent so there was plenty of time where as Coventry only had hours to win an appeal10-14 points means they qualify for appeal. Given Rente only missed out due to timing when he'd have sailed through just weeks earlier it's a massive grey area.
I'd be intrigued to know the reasoning granting Costa's but not Rente, Kluivert or others. Another player missed out by 48hrs & yet that wasn't deemed "exceptional circumstances" but Costa is.
Costa was a free agent so there was plenty of time where as Coventry only had hours to win an appeal
It s strange how we knew Hyam was the subject of interest by Blackburn throughout the window ( and we instigated the moved ) but had no plan b) or c ) if we accept that Rente was a)They had nearly a week
It s strange how we knew Hyam was the subject of interest by Blackburn throughout the window ( and we instigated the moved ) but had no plan b) or c ) if we accept that Rente was a)
Of course he did, hence the replacement was there.Its almost as if Robins knew nothing about the Hyam sale
He was sold nearly a week before deadline day, its not like he was sold with an hour to go. And clubs should have a constant list of players they are looking at or interested in for every position. That's basic recruitment planning.Of course he did, hence the replacement was there.
Yeah and he knew about the player lined up. Although they should have had backups for him.He was sold nearly a week before deadline day, its not like he was sold with an hour to go. And clubs should have a constant list of players they are looking at or interested in for every position. That's basic recruitment planning.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Of course he did, hence the replacement was there.
Was he on a free?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Why did we not get him over the line before going for two young loans?
I believe we only became interested in him once Hyam had been sold, we were going to be paying a fee for him.
Sure Platty posted something up that it was much earlier in August that it was off
Can't find it now though, so have to assume either the man City guy that went to Burnley or one of the two loans we have now were replacement
Because his old club got him over the line ....for 15 minutesWhy did we not get him over the line before going for two young loans?
If he is not good enough for Burnley why would he be good enough for us.Find it slightly frustrating that he chose to go to Burnley and yet has played 1 minute so far.