So other than the immense satisfaction, where does this leave us, CCFC?
Basically, as I see it anyway, at least where we already are and maybe even slightly better off.
Our sub-lease remains on the same terms, and whoever takes over the CBS, be that the Council, the bondholders, or an as yet unknown third party, I believe that contract remains in force.
It is not just commercial property tenants at risk of becoming insolvent but also commercial landlords.
www.solegal.co.uk
So we're not going to get kicked out. We'll be the only paying tenant in the place anyway, so why would an Administrator want us to leave - the people flapping about this really aren't thinking it through.
The wrinkle here is that the bondholders have the stadium as security, but there's also a clause in the lease that says it reverts to the Council in the event of insolvency. I'm not sure how that pans out, but I can't see the leaseholders taking it lying down if the Council try to take it back. Book those court seats now!
Last but not least, I'm still of the opinion that the stadium valuation that supported the bond issue was smoke and mirrors. What value is the stadium without Wasps and with CCFC on a short-term lease? I think we'll soon see.
I suppose the dream scenario is that CCFC get their hands on that 250-year lease at a knock-down price. That could happen I suppose, but it would need SISU to sell or at least to find some extra investment somewhere.
The crystal ball is a bit cloudy at the moment, but my prediction is that we end up in at least a slightly better position than we are now and possibly in a much better one. Either way it would hopefully be without 30 big blokes who ought be in London, wrecking the pitch every two weeks.